In a message dated 6/18/2006 8:03:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
Anthere9(a)yahoo.com writes:
I think that it would be interesting that all current candidates
actually *give* their opinion publicly on what they consider is
membership, on how membership should be taken into account and which
type of organisation they envision would be best for the Foundation.
Actually, there are no "current candidates" because there is no election
underway. This is very premature. Also, there are plenty of non-candidates who
would want to have a say in this. Why limit it?
Danny
Show replies by date