Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
Angela wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
>
>> Which leads me to another question. Who controls this definition?
>>
http://freedomdefined.org/History gives a bit of the history, but I couldn't
>> find anything about the current situation.
>>
>
> It's based on community consensus. See
>
http://freedomdefined.org/Authoring_process
>
> Angela
>
> _______________________________________________
>
Sorry, Angela, but community consensus is one incredibly
silly way to describe your little coteries bit of will formation.
I am sorry, but the only appropriate response here is
out loud laughter. Please do not promote any freedomdefined
text on this mailing list as a "community" effort. That really
makes scotsmen blush. (And yes, that goes double for Erik too.)
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen