Funny, I was trying to find out whether that was the case a few months ago with respect to Wikisource. What happened back then suggested that it was NOT the case. Have a look at the mailing list archives for November and December 2005 and you will see what I mean. I posted about the Wikisource copyright licence ambiguity to foundation-l and the Wikisource Scriptorium and got very unhelpful answers. I therefore went ahead and started and consultation about what the terms of the Wikisource copyright page should be. The conclusion of that consultation was that it was not only free licences that people wanted on Wikisource. Free licences are certainly prefereable, but there are things that are not available under free licences. We also have a serious problem with "fair use" at Wikisource where people are posting copyvios and then claiming "fair use". Personally I'm in favour of banning "fair use" contributions to Wikisource given that Wikisource reproduces the whole of a work. You've come in months after I was trying to sort this out and completely contradicted what was thrashed out then. It really would have been helpful if you had actually participated in things months back. There are going to be more than a few rather annoyed Wikisource users at this news. David Newton