Does it matter? Can we just end the thread without
pinning the blame on anyone. It is not just this one
thread, I had just noticed the en.WP conversations on
a major increase lately.
Birgitte SB
--- James Hare <messedrocker(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah... I was wondering meself why Danny posted this
English Wikipedia info
on the Foundation List.
On 9/30/06, Birgitte SB <birgitte_sb(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
I do agree with Gerad's ideas, but I also think
this
is not the place to be discussing what en.WP
speedy
deletion criteria should or should not be. I
have
heard en.WP has an entire mailing list all to
itself.
Birgitte SB
--Gerad's message--
Hoi,
We should before we want to even consider policies
whereby sources are
required consider what it would do to other
projects.
Many of the other
projects do not have the maturity to follow the
lead
of the English
Wikipedia they do not have sufficient content and
burdening the content
creation with this zeal would put a damper on the
creation of new
content. The idea that the English language
sources
are universally
good
is problematic as well.
We should also consider how much work it is to
source
all the unsourced
articles. I assume that the amount of time
involved is
such that it is
not even feasible to source all English articles
that
do not have
sources in half a year. When an article has one
source, it does not
follow that the article is sufficiently sourced.
Uncompletely sourced
articles are as bad or worse than articles that
have
not been sourced
at
all.
I am afraid I could not disagree with you more.
Thanks,
GerardM
James Hare wrote:
> Well, if we make it a new criterion, we
shouldn't
apply it
retroactively. I
> understand there was a time when sources didn't
mean
as much.
>
> As for the unsourced articles that currently
exist,
we could do some
very
> long PROD deal with it -- articles tagged as
having
zero sources have
three
> months to get at least ONE SOURCE for any part
of
the article before
it
> qualifies for speedy. That's a generous amount
of
time.
On 9/30/06, George Herbert
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/30/06, James Hare <messedrocker(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>>> Let's mkae a new speedy criterion: if there's
no
sources, nuke it.
With
>>> fire.
>>>
>>> On 9/30/06, daniwo59(a)aol.com
<daniwo59(a)aol.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have just deleted an article,
[[Porchesia]].
Any admins are
welcome
>>>
> to
>
>>> read the history. It was created in November.
>>>
>>> Problem is, there is no such place.
>>>
>>> Hmmm.
>>>
>>> Danny
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/l
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)wikimedia.org
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around