In wikipedias users make articles, which are not articles but galleries or there are
(galleries) sections of articles. It is often the same what we have on commons. Look
here:
http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalisz#Galeria_Zdj.C4.99.C4.87_Kalisza
and
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Kalisz
or
http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krak%C3%B3w_-_album
and
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Krak%C3%B3w
So, I think, that not only users want albums of their cities. Many people want to look for
Zoological atlas, Historical atlas... We have many files now, but on commons there are
described in English or native language for described city, village or person. If I want
read something about Madrid I must know English or Spanish. If you want read about Polish
villages on commons you must know that language. Of course we hawe Wikipedia, but people
wants gallery of photos, maps and other graphics described in their languages. Description
in all languages is not good, if it on one page.
But, if we will have a new project: "Wikiatlas" or "Wikialbums"... So
I've written about it on meta. I only supplemented old proposal for project
Wikiatlas:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiatlas#Not_only_geographical_atlas
What do you think about it?
Przykuta