On 04/12/2007, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 04/12/2007, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Boy, I sure would hate to be the lawyer who
had to explain this point
> to a judge.
You know, as the person paid to be the legal
expert here, it would be
helpful if you would make straight points as opposed to unhelpful
rhetoric.
That was an extremely straight point: that argument is unlikely to fly.
He didn't say that, though, although I agree that's probably what he
meant. There is a difference between something being difficult and it
being unlikely to succeed. He said the former and (I think) meant the
latter. Some form of explanation would also be nice, of course...