Adam: well put.
We may want to translate '*Service and equity*', from recent strategy
discussions, more widely: into a range of contexts as well as languages.
🌍🌏🌎🌑
On Thu., May 20, 2021, 3:19 a.m. Adam Wight, <adam.wight(a)wikimedia.de>
wrote:
In case there really is a question about whether
we should be working
towards greater equity, please see the Wikimedia Foundation's vision
statement [1],
Imagine a world in which every single human being
can freely share in
the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment
and in more detail [2],
... our goal is to impact the largest-possible
number of readers and
contributors, and to eliminate barriers that could preclude
people from
accessing or contributing to our projects ...
Since sj's point is in the context of Wikimedia, "goals of increasing
equity across the world, and supporting underrepresented communities"
should be understood as "goals of increasing equity [to read and
contribute to Wikimedia projects] across the world, and supporting
underrepresented [Wikimedia] communities". Please correct me if I've
misunderstood these affiliate review suggestions.
Regards,
[[mw:User:Adamw]]
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Vision
[2]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Guiding_Principles#Ser…
On 5/20/21 7:34 AM, Alexander N Krassotkin wrote:
Dear Samuel,
Just a note...
"The mission of the Wikimedia Foundation is to empower and engage
people around the world to collect and develop educational content
under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it
effectively and globally".
https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/mission/
But not "increasing equity across the world".
You can create separate funds for this and other good purposes.
sasha.
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:05 PM Julia Brungs <jbrungs(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> Dear SJ,
>
> Thank you very much for your questions here and on meta. We are
working on
answering them and will post the answers on meta (don't worry I
will reply to this thread again when the answers are live so people can go
and find them).
>
> Best wishes,
> Julia
>
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 7:32 PM Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> :) Dimi, do you know of reports on
subsets of this, for groups and
projects in Europe? I discovered to my delight a
beautiful summary of WMF
grants made up to 2020 -- thanks Guillaume! -- which partly answers the
first question. But this does not include donations + external grant
funding that directly supports affiliates.
>>
>> One other point -- It was noted that 3a and 3d seem similar. I
updated
these Qs on meta to be clearer. I meant:
>>
>> 3a: What groups do we envision making individual funding
recommendations? [timing, who decides, what constraints]
>> 3d: How do we envision reviewing how
things are going? [peer
feedback on budgets and plans, reflection on the overall
balance of funding
across the movement.]
>>
>> These inform one another, but are distinct. And the first is more
than
just updating current processes: major gaps to fill include funding
for projects under $500, and multi-year funding for infrastructure and
projects -- among the most common requests.
>>
>> SJ
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:52 AM Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <
dimitar.parvanov.dimitrov(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Samuel,
>>>
>>> Thanks for structuring these questions regarding funding and
fundraising. I just wanted to pitch in a +1.
>>>
>>> It would be very useful to have answers to some of these for our
public facing work. Such questions pop up naturally in conversations and
the more granular we can be in our answers the better the reaction we get.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dimi
>>>
>>> На пн, 17.05.2021 г. в 21:13 ч. Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com>
написа:
>>>> Dear list,
>>>>
>>>> Risker posed an excellent question in the AffCom thread about
review and development of movement funding, which could use its own
dedicated thread. Riffing on the theme, here are a dozen questions for
anyone who knows part of the answer -- particularly those who helped
develop the 2019 recommendations on resource allocation , the 2020 approach
to hubs and participatory resource allocation, and the grants strategy
relaunch.
>>>>
>>>> We can move this discussion to meta if the thread becomes
unwieldy. (:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Current state of movement funding
>>>>
>>>> 1a. Roughly what % of global fundraising is currently allocated
to affiliates, or other entities + projects not run by the WMF? (my poor
guess)
>>>>
>>>> 1b. Roughly how much regional fundraising goes directly to major
affiliates?
>>>>
>>>> 1c. Which affiliates with annual plan grants have been growing
over time, and how is the expansion of existing budgets approved?
>>>>
>>>> 1d. Which affiliates have gotten their first APG in the past
five years, and how has that developed over time?
>>>>
>>>> 2. Current review process
>>>>
>>>> 2a. How is funding by WMF of movement affiliates (general
operations, and large specific projects) currently determined? Does the
Board engage with this?
>>>>
>>>> 2b. Is the funding of affiliate work linked to goals of
increasing equity across the world, and supporting underrepresented
communities? If so, how / how is this visualized?
>>>>
>>>> 2c. What other mechanisms for focusing and allocating resources
are good examples to replicate?
>>>>
>>>> 2d. What other bilateral projects (such as joint projects, and
grant or microgrant programs), run by large affiliates and hubs other than
the WMF, currently exist? Which seem like examples to replicate?
>>>>
>>>> 3. Desired futures!
>>>>
>>>> 3a. What movement bodies are expected to play any role in
recommendations about funding (extending, withdrawing, denying funding) to
new and existing affiliates, now that the FDC is inactive?
>>>>
>>>> 3b. Is there a possibility of the FDC returning? How do past FDC
members have about this? What was found to be good and bad about the FDC
process?
>>>>
>>>> 3c. What elements of this is the global council expected to
take up in its first year? What elements are hubs expected to take up, now
and in the future?
>>>>
>>>> 3d. What roles do we envision each of {WMF, hubs, affiliates,
community members} to play in reviewing movement budgets/plans and the
volume and focus of future funding [re]allocation?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>>
>> --
>> Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617
529
4266
>>
_______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
_______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
To
unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org,
guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at: