This is perhaps a bit academic, but this is not really the case, at least in UK copyright law.
The 'copying' inherent in viewing a web page is permissible under two grounds:
1) there is a statutory exemption in copyright law for this specific activity (in section 28a of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, if anyone cares to look it up ;) ). This would likely not apply to details of AI models as the exemption excludes 'a computer program or a database'. Whether it would apply to Bobbypedia depends on whether it counts as a database (strikes me as arguable).
2) there is probably an implicit licence granted by whoever publishes the work for whoever views it to use it. The scope of this implicit licence is highly debatable and probably extremely limited. Do you have an implied licence to download the HTML of a webpage into your browser cache and use your web browser to render the page and display the resulting content? Very likely. Do you have an implied licence to save a PDF copy onto your hard drive? Maybe. Do you have an implied licence to use the page to create a personal AI model and distribute the output? That is very unclear, probably not. Perhaps less likely if there was also an explicit license attached to the page.