Hi mailing list colleagues,
I'm not sure whether I should make this be public, but I tend to be a
frequent participant on mailing lists so maybe sharing this would be good.
I am taking a temporary break from participating on Wikimedia mailing
lists. Recently I am finding myself frequently experiencing frustration in
conversations on lists, and I am concerned that in my frustration I may
write something that I later regret. Also, I would like to be a generally
positive presence on the lists, and I think that a "reset" would be good.
I will remain in the Wikiverse for the foreseeable future. I like
Wikimedia's educational mission, and I like my current principal project. I
will continue to be a list subscriber, and may occasionally read list
discussions. Also, I will continue to read off list emails. Perhaps in a
month or two I will resume participating on lists.
Thanks for all that you do in support of the mission. The Wikiverse is
amazing and I am grateful to be a small part of it.
Pine
( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
Hi everyone!
Last week I published a cross-wiki tool to quickly add and remove
categories from pages. Since it’s not specific to any wiki, I wasn’t
sure where to announce it, and some people suggested this mailing list,
so here it is :)
The tool is called QuickCategories [1][2]. It’s similar to the
QuickStatements tool for Wikidata [3][4]: you prepare a list of edits in
a tabular, textual format – e. g. in a spreadsheet – and then you paste
it into the tool to create a batch, which you can then run.
Some page|+Category:Something|+Category:Something else|-Category:Other
Other page|+Category:Something|+Category:Something else|-Category:Other
For example, yesterday I used this tool to add [[Category:Tomb in the
Panthéon de Paris]] to several Commons categories that I had created
earlier (before realizing they should be in this category) [5], and
Harmonia Amanda has used it to categorize thousands of sportspeople by
their nationality according to Wikidata (e. g. [6]).
Please use the tool responsibly – I’m reasonably confident that it won’t
do bad things on the wikitext level (it uses MediaWiki Parser from Hell
[7], the same library as EarwigBot [8]), but it can’t decide for you
whether a category is appropriate or not. For instance, in the
announcement on Commons [9] I had proposed to automatically add
[[Category:Politicians of the United Kingdom]] to all Members of
Parliament of the United Kingdom according to Wikidata, but it turned
out this category may be more debatable than I expected. I still think
it should be possible to add this category to some automatically
selected people, using a more refined query, but I’ll leave that to
people more familiar with UK politics :)
If you have any questions, feel free to reply here or {{ping}} me
on-wiki – otherwise, I just hope this is useful to some of you :)
Best regards,
Lucas Werkmeister
[1]: https://tools.wmflabs.org/quickcategories/
[2]: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Lucas_Werkmeister/QuickCategories
[3]: https://tools.wmflabs.org/quickstatements/
[4]: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:QuickStatements
[5]: https://tools.wmflabs.org/quickcategories/batch/26/
[6]: https://tools.wmflabs.org/quickcategories/batch/25/
[7]: https://github.com/earwig/mwparserfromhell/
[8]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EarwigBot
[9]:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump&oldid=…
I noticed just now that the Foundation is soliciting applications for a new CTO:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6515003866130505729
Can we please hire a CTO who would prefer to protect reader privacy
above the interests of any State or non-state actors, whether they
have infiltrated staff, contractor, and NDA signatory ranks, and
whether it interferes with reader statistics and analytics or not,
please?
In particular, I would like to repeat my request that we should not be logging
personally identifiable information which might increase our subpoena
burden or result in privacy violation incidents. Fuzzing geolocation
is okay, but we should not be transmitting IP addresses into logs
across even a LAN, for example, and we certainly shouldn't be
purchasing hardware with backdoor coprocessors wasting electricity and
exposing us to government or similar intrusions:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/analytics/2017-January/005696.html
Best regards,
Jim
Hi all,
The Wikimania organizing team is now happy to announce the *Program Design*
<https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2019:Program_design> of Wikimania
2019!
We believe that this year’s conference theme
<https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2019:Theme> requires a format
that is *future-oriented,
collaborative, active, and focused on practical problem-solving. *The
program will therefore consist of a series of parallel *spaces* (or
tracks), lead by *leaders,* and through practical training, learning,
idea-sharing and cross-cultural collaboration focusing on different *topic
areas*.
The call for proposals for these *Leaders*, and what they would like to do
with those *Spaces*, is NOW OPEN. We invite you to visit the Program Design
page <https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2019:Program_design> on the
Wikimania Wiki to read more.
Best,
*Eric Luth*
Conference Manager, Wikimedia Sverige
eric.luth(a)wikimedia.se
+46 (0) 765 55 50 95
Stöd fri kunskap, bli medlem i Wikimedia Sverige.
Läs mer på blimedlem.wikimedia.se
Tl;dr: We are launching a new Communications Committee (ComCom) and
replacing the existing ComCom list with a new Movement Communications mailing
list.
Hello!
After much discussion and brainstorming with the members of the current
Communications committee, the Wikimedia Communications department is
implementing changes to the Communications committee and how we
collectively support each other's communications efforts.
*Specifically, we are:*
Putting out a call for members of a new Communications committee (ComCom)
which will work on more focused and long-term projects together.
Replacing the current list with a new Movement Communications (MoveCom)
mailing list to continue to facilitate wider discussions.
*What does that mean exactly?*
This new Communications committee will be composed of 10-15 volunteers
serving 3-year terms, work closely with the Wikimedia Foundation
Communications department, and be empowered to support communications
efforts across the movement. Over the coming weeks, the Communications
department will seek out and select potential members who will work with us
to further establish the group's initial plans, scope, and activities. See
below for more information on this selection process.
The new Movement Communications mailing list will allow the 200+ people on
this current mailing list to engage in new and more transparent
discussions. Current members will be asked to rejoin using a new process
which allows us to publicly display who is involved with the mailing list
discussions. More information on how to join the new list will be shared in
coming weeks.
*What will these new groups do?*
The new Communications committee will work with the Communications
department on implementation of movement-wide communications projects and
support the development of communications capacities within movement groups
and affiliates. How the group does that and what specifically that includes
is something we are hoping to discuss with the inaugural committee.
The new Movement Communications mailing list, which will be facilitated by
the new Communications committee, will be able to discuss topics brought up
by members of the mailing list, Foundation's Communications department, or
Communications committee. These topics may range from brainstorming
solutions to a problem faced by a specific group on the list to
coordinating communications efforts across groups on major events.
*How do I join the new groups?*
We will be sharing information on joining the new Movement communications
group mailing list when it is fully setup and ready.
If you are interested in joining the new 10-15 person Communications
committee, please send an email to gvarnum[image: @]wikimedia.org by 17
April 2019 and include:
1. Acknowledgement that this is a three-year appointment and you are indeed
interested and able to serve.
2. Your community and staff (if you have any) usernames which you use on
Wikimedia projects. Also any information on other roles you may have within
the movement (please include both staff and volunteer roles). Please note
that you must be in good standing (ie. not blocked) on the wikis to
participate.
3. A brief statement on why you would like to serve on the Communications
committee, and in particular what you believe you can bring to the group
and what you hope to gain from the experience.
4. A brief statement on what ideas, if any, you have for what the new
Communications committee could do or how the Foundation could help support
its efforts.
The inaugural committee will be selected by the Communications department.
Additional and future members will be selected by the committee, with
support from the Communications department.
If you have any questions about these changes, the new groups, or the
selection process for the new Communications committee, please feel free to
reach out to me.
Thank you!
-greg
PS. Please help us with translating and sharing this update and call for
members:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications_committee/Call_for_members_-…
--
Gregory Varnum (pronouns - he/his/him)
Communications Strategist
Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
Greetings! I'm excited to be the new Chief Operating Officer at the
Wikimedia Foundation and look forward to meeting many of you as I grow in
this role. Until then, feel free to reach out to me at janeen(a)wikimedia.org.
I've been busy supporting the Medium Term Planning team and wanted to send
an update on our process.
The Wikimedia Foundation is currently engaged in the process of creating a
medium-term plan that will support our 2030 Strategic Direction. This plan
is a representation of how we will lead, build, design and serve the global
world and provide access to free knowledge.
In the process, we are setting up the Foundation to be more nimble so we
can adapt to recommendations coming out of movement strategy. In the past,
we have typically planned one year at a time. This new process that we are
using will allow us to plan for longer-term goals aligned to knowledge
equity and knowledge as a service.
For the next three to five years, the Wikimedia Foundation will focus on
these two goals that will support our strategic direction to become the
infrastructure of free knowledge:
-
Grow participation globally, focusing on emerging markets
-
Grow the use of Wikipedia and Wikimedia across the globe. Focus on
increasing Wikipedia use in low-awareness or low-use geographies and
languages, in order to bring Wikipedia’s use in line with rates
of overall
internet usage.
-
Modernize our product experience
-
Make contributor and reader experiences useful and joyful. Move from
viewing Wikipedia as solely a website, to viewing the Wikimedia ecosystem
as a collection of knowledge, information, and insights with infinite
possible product experiences and applications.
To create our medium-term plan, we have been conducting a collaborative
process to gather ideas and input from across the Foundation to help us
narrow in on a set of key priorities and outcomes that we need to
accomplish to achieve our two goals.
The medium-term plan is intended to stay at the strategic level so that it
describes what we want to accomplish, without going into great detail about
how we are going to accomplish it. This level of focus will allow us to be
clear about what the Foundation will achieve in the next several years,
while giving ourselves the flexibility to adapt to recommendations from the
Movement Strategy process, take advantage of emergent opportunities, and
experiment with tactics and strategies.
We will soon be finishing a draft of the medium-term plan to present to the
Board of Trustees at their next meeting on March 28th, 2019. After we share
the plan with the board, we will be requesting feedback from you and from
all parts of the community from April 7-20th. We are looking for your
feedback on whether the outcomes we hope to achieve over the next 3 to 5
years are appropriate given the goals of the overall Wikimedia Movement and
our strategic direction. We want to know: are these the right “big things”
to accomplish in the next 3-5 years? We would also like feedback on
whether our overall metrics are appropriate and aspirational enough given
our ambitious vision. Are we setting the right targets for how we will
measure our progress?
After we receive all comments and feedback, we will make a final round of
updates to the our Medium-term plan before publishing it again back on meta
at the end of May. In subsequent years, we intend to update the plan on an
annual basis to adapt to new information, changes in our environment, and
the things we learn along the way.
We hope that you all will provide your insight and thoughts to help the
Foundation build this plan and continue to make progress toward our
strategic direction.
Thank you,
Janeen Uzzell
Timeline:
-
March 28 - We will share the draft plan with the Foundation’s Board of
Trustees
-
April 6 - Plan published on Meta Wiki
-
April 6-20 - Community review and comment period
-
April 21-May 10 - Revise plan as needed based on community comments
-
May 31 - Publish revised plan on Meta
Wikidata surpassed the English language Wikipedia in the number of
revisions in the database, about 45 minutes ago today.I was tipped off by a
tweet [1] a few day ago and have been watching via a script that displays
the largest revision id and its timestamp. Here's the point where Wikidata
overtakes English Wikipedia (times in UTC):
[ariel@bigtrouble wikidata-huge]$ python3 ./get_revid_info.py -d
www.wikidata.org -r 888603998,888603999,888604000
revid 888603998 at 2019-03-20T06:00:59Z
revid 888603999 at 2019-03-20T06:00:59Z
revid 888604000 at 2019-03-20T06:00:59Z
[ariel@bigtrouble wikidata-huge]$ python3 ./get_revid_info.py -d
en.wikipedia.org -r 888603998,888603999,888604000
revid 888603998 at 2019-03-20T06:00:59Z
revid 888603999 at 2019-03-20T06:00:59Z
revid 888604000 at 2019-03-20T06:01:00Z
Only 45 minutes later, the gap is already over 2000 revsions:
[ariel@bigtrouble wikidata-huge]$ python3 ./compare_sizes.py
Last enwiki revid is 888606979 and last wikidata revid is 888629401
2019-03-20 06:46:03: diff is 22422
Have a nice day!
Ariel
[1] https://twitter.com/MonsieurAZ/status/1106565116508729345
Hello everyone,
I'm just sending a reminder that the below Showcase will be starting in
half an hour.
-Janna Layton
Hi all,
The next Research Showcase, “Learning How to Correct a Knowledge Base
from the Edit History” and “TableNet: An Approach for Determining
Fine-grained Relations for Wikipedia Tables” will be live-streamed
this Wednesday, March 20, 2019, at 11:30 AM PST/18:30 UTC (Please note
the change in time in UTC due to daylight saving changes in the U.S.).
The first presentation is about using edit history to automatically
correct constraint violations in Wikidata, and the second is about
interlinking Wikipedia tables.
YouTube stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p62PMhkVNM
As usual, you can join the conversation on IRC at #wikimedia-research.
You can also watch our past research showcases at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Research/Showcase .
This month's presentations:
Learning How to Correct a Knowledge Base from the Edit History
By Thomas Pellissier Tanon (Télécom ParisTech), Camille Bourgaux (DI
ENS, CNRS, ENS, PSL Univ. & Inria), Fabian Suchanek (Télécom
ParisTech), WWW'19.
The curation of Wikidata (and other knowledge bases) is crucial to
keep the data consistent, to fight vandalism and to correct good faith
mistakes. However, manual curation of the data is costly. In this
work, we propose to take advantage of the edit history of the
knowledge base in order to learn how to correct constraint violations
automatically. Our method is based on rule mining, and uses the edits
that solved violations in the past to infer how to solve similar
violations in the present. For example, our system is able to learn
that the value of the [[d:Property:P21|sex or gender]] property
[[d:Q467|woman]] should be replaced by [[d:Q6581072|female]]. We
provide [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-game/distributed/#game=43
a Wikidata game] that suggests our corrections to the users in order
to improve Wikidata. Both the evaluation of our method on past
corrections, and the Wikidata game statistics show significant
improvements over baselines.
TableNet: An Approach for Determining Fine-grained Relations for
Wikipedia Tables
By Besnik Fetahu
Wikipedia tables represent an important resource, where information is
organized w.r.t table schemas consisting of columns. In turn each
column, may contain instance values that point to other Wikipedia
articles or primitive values (e.g. numbers, strings etc.). In this
work, we focus on the problem of interlinking Wikipedia tables for two
types of table relations: equivalent and subPartOf. Through such
relations, we can further harness semantically related information by
accessing related tables or facts therein. Determining the relation
type of a table pair is not trivial, as it is dependent on the
schemas, the values therein, and the semantic overlap of the cell
values in the corresponding tables. We propose TableNet, an approach
that constructs a knowledge graph of interlinked tables with subPartOf
and equivalent relations. TableNet consists of two main steps: (i) for
any source table we provide an efficient algorithm to find all
candidate related tables with high coverage, and (ii) a neural based
approach, which takes into account the table schemas, and the
corresponding table data, we determine with high accuracy the table
relation for a table pair. We perform an extensive experimental
evaluation on the entire Wikipedia with more than 3.2 million tables.
We show that with more than 88% we retain relevant candidate tables
pairs for alignment. Consequentially, with an accuracy of 90% we are
able to align tables with subPartOf or equivalent relations.
Comparisons with existing competitors show that TableNet has superior
performance in terms of coverage and alignment accuracy.
--
Janna Layton (she, her)
Administrative Assistant - Audiences & Technology
Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
I found a 404 on 5000 Q pages, because the data base was turned off,
it should have been fixed, but all they did was to deprecate the entry.
I contacted the 2 main creators, editors. the one told me not to talk to
her on
her page, or she would have me blocked and to put it on the wikidata
discussion
page which she did not go to to answer me, the other one contacted a bot
owner who
changed all the URL’s to the wayback URL.but when wayback took down some of
the
last entry's, and i tried to talk to that bot direct he refused to talk to
me.
this all makes me feel like a whistle-blower.
SEE: [Wikitech-l] Question to WMF: Backlog on bugs
From: Caroline Becker
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 4:51 AM
To: Wikimedia Mailing
List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikidata now officially has more total
edits than English language Wikipedia
But...
bots are operated, written, and reviewed by real humans ? Like if I
spend 2
hours adding "painting by Vincent van Gogh" manually on every
relevant item
by hand, how is that more valuable than spending 20 minutes
to write a bot
that does that for me (and can be used for similar tasks)
?
Caroline
Le mer. 20 mars 2019 à 10:45, Gabriel Thullen
< gabriel(a)thullen.com > a
écrit :
> Sorry about this mail, I
hate to rain on somebody's parade but:
> Ever since Wikidata was set up,
there have been more edit made by bots than
> by humans (registered
contributor + anonymous contributor), except for a
> few periods in 2017
and 2018. On the other hand, the activity of the bots
> on the English
Wikipedia has almost always been lower than the activity of
> anonymous
contributors, and that activity has always been well below that
> of
registered contributors. There was one exception, in 2013 where there
>
was a spike of bot activity.
> We could also talk about the average number
of edits per contributor which
> appears to be around 100 on the English
Wikipedia and 1,200 on Wikidata
> (these numbers are after removing the
estimated edits done by bots). Quite
> a difference.
> The different
Wikimedia projects rely on the community to police and curate
> the
content of these encyclopedias and data collections. I am therefore a
>
bit wary of what is happening with Wikidata where more edits are still
>
being done by bots than by real humans (by "real" I mean "real" not like
>
"real" as in the TV series "real humans")
>
> Best regards
>
Gabe
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:25 AM Olushola Olaniyan
<
> olaniyanshola15(a)gmail.com >
> wrote:
>
> >
This is a good news.
> >
> > Cheers!!!
> >
>
> Olaniyan Olushola
> > CEO DataAccess Systems Ltd
> >
President, Wikimedia Nigeria
> > Member, Affcom ( Wikimedia
Foundation)
> > Co-director Wiki Women Radio
> > www.wikimedia.org.ng
> > shola(a)wikimedia.org.ng
> > olaniyanshola15(a)gmail.com
> > +2348167352512
> >
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019, 08:52 Ziko van Dijk
< zvandijk(a)gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Ariel
Glenn,
> > > Thanks for the notification, very interesting. Well, we
all know that
> > > making a lot of edits on Wikidata is "easier" or
happens quicker than
> on
> > > Wikipedia, for various
reasons. But still it is a nice milestone to
> > > congratulate to
Wikidata. Hereby. :-)
> > > Kind regards
> > >
Ziko
> > >
> > >
> > > Am Mi., 20. März 2019
um 07:58 Uhr schrieb Gerard Meijssen <
> > > gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com >:
> > >
> > > >
Hoi,
> > > > So in stead of calling us all Wikipedia, let us be
known as
> Wikidata...
> > > > HUUUUU
> > >
> Thanks,
> > > >
GerardM
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at
07:48, Ariel Glenn WMF < ariel(a)wikimedia.org >
> > >
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Wikidata surpassed the
English language Wikipedia in the number of
> > > > >
revisions in the database, about 45 minutes ago today.I was tipped
> >
off
> > > > by a
> > > > > tweet [1] a few day
ago and have been watching via a script that
> > > displays
>
> > > > the largest revision id and its timestamp. Here's the point
where
> > > > Wikidata
> > > > > overtakes
English Wikipedia (times in UTC):
> > > > >
> > >
> > [ariel@bigtrouble wikidata-huge]$ python3 ./get_revid_info.py
-d
> > > > > www.wikidata.org -r 888603998 ,888603999,888604000
> > > > > revid 888603998 at
2019-03-20T06:00:59Z
> > > > > revid 888603999 at
2019-03-20T06:00:59Z
> > > > > revid 888604000 at
2019-03-20T06:00:59Z
> > > > > [ariel@bigtrouble
wikidata-huge]$ python3 ./get_revid_info.py -d
> > > > >
en.wikipedia.org -r 888603998 ,888603999,888604000
> > > > >
revid 888603998 at 2019-03-20T06:00:59Z
> > > > > revid 888603999 at 2019-03-20T06:00:59Z
> > > > > revid 888604000 at
2019-03-20T06:01:00Z
> > > > >
> > > > >
Only 45 minutes later, the gap is already over 2000 revsions:
> > >
> >
> > > > > [ariel@bigtrouble wikidata-huge]$ python3
./compare_sizes.py
> > > > > Last enwiki revid is 888606979 and last wikidata revid is 888629401
> > > > > 2019-03-20
06:46:03: diff is 22422
> > > > >
> > > > >
Have a nice day!
> > > > >
> > > > >
Ariel
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://twitter.com/MonsieurAZ/status/1106565116508729345
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > >
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > >
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > > >
> Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l ,
> > > >
> <mailto: wikimedia-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
_______________________________________________
> > > >
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New
messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > > >
Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l ,
> > > >
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > >
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l ,
> > >
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
> _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l
mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l ,
> >
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing
list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l ,
>
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l
mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l ,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Hello all,
I know there is a FOSS portal but are there any portals for other Open *
topics, such as Open Science (including citizen science), Open Access,
ect.? The rationale behind is to have these portals as umbrella groups
for resources and what's there in these big movement topics and have
them in one place- which is Wikipedia. Would this idea be worth it for
the other movements?
Thank you.
--
Svetlana Belkin
https://senseopenness.com/