-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
I know we heard some opinions on that project proposal, I just want to
remind everyone who did comment on the list, to go make it count by
commenting at the actual proposal page on Meta.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Victims_of_Soviet_Repressions_Memorial
Very respectfully,
Jon-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAklh7s4ACgkQ6+ro8Pm1AtU5DgCcDS8ZLKVARAI25GPNYXGp/dM2
WNAAoLNS9qDKxMau+dcCWD7OjKNJHK+X
=uTtV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi all,
A few days ago, the term for the ombudsman commission expired.
Unfortunately, I missed an announcement about the commission for 2009. Could
someone clarify who will be the 2009 members, and where the announcement
(will be/is) made?
Thanks,
Lodewijk
I realized that at Requests for new languages [1] we have a number of
proposals for projects in moribund languages [2]. In brief, when
roughly less than 1000 dominantly older persons speak one language,
this language will be dead when those speakers die. Even some larger
languages [than mentioned ones], like Lower Sorbian [3] is (with
~15.000 of speakers) are deeply endangered and it is almost
predictable that this language won't be alive in the next century.
But, cases like Lower Sorbian one is -- are border cases -- and I
don't see a problem with creating such project inside of the standard
procedure.
However, we have some number of cases where project is requested for a
language with less than 100 older speakers.
My proposal is to do the next in the cases of moribund languages:
* Reject proposal for project creation.
* Suggesting them to put their language corpus at [multilingual] Wikisource.
* Allowing them to work on Incubator if they really want to spend some
efforts on language revival.
* If a project at Incubator shows possibilities to be a live one, they
may ask for project again, when they will have to pass all necessary
steps (localization of MediaWiki and so on).
This is a kind of a "political issue", so I prefer to see discussion
here before discussion at Language subcommittee.
[1] - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages
[2] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_death
[3] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lower_Sorbian
Hey folks -
This is a very quick note, officially updating everyone on the
progress of the fundraiser. Many of you will already know this, but I
wanted to make it official :-)
Currently, you will see that the sitenotice thermometer says we've
reached 6.1 million dollars, which means we have exceeded our original
goal of six million dollars! This is fantastic, and I'm really happy.
To put that in context: In 2008-09, prior to the launch of the
fundraiser, we had received just under two million dollars in
donations and commitments from a mix of foundations, individual donors
and business development revenues. (That includes the 08-09 1m from
Sloan, which will arrive this month.) Since its launch, the
fundraiser has brought in a little over four million dollars. This
means we currently have received in 08-09 a total of 6.1 million
dollars, which will fully cover our projected 08-09 costs.
Last year, by contrast, the fundraiser brought in a total of 1.6
million dollars.
For the Wikimedia Foundation to more than double donations during a
time of major global financial crisis is an amazing accomplishment -
and is testimony to the dedication and strength of our supporters.
They believe in what we're doing and understand why it's important:
I'm grateful to each and every one of them.
And I want to thank everyone who has contributed to this year's
fundraiser. There are too many people to name individually, and even
that makes me happy - I love the fact that so many staff members and
volunteers came together to work to make the fundraiser such a
success.
Tomorrow, the current sitenotices will be replaced with a thank you
banner, which will stay up for an as-yet-undetermined period –
probably a week or thereabouts. We will continue to solicit and
accept donations during that period (we always accept donations!), but
the messaging will be primarily about thanking people :-)
Thanks, and happy new year!
Sue
WikiSym, an international conference devoted to wiki research, will be
in Florida this October and is currently accepting paper submissions:
the deadline is March 27th. Please let me know any questions you may
have, particularly regarding how this conference program relates to
Wikimania, Recent Changes Camp or other conferences.
best,
Phoebe
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Dirk Riehle" <dirk(a)riehle.org>
To: "Dirk Riehle" <dirk(a)riehle.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 11:49:50 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: WikiSym 2009 Call for Papers (Submissions)
========================================================
CALL FOR PAPERS
========================================================
W I K I S Y M 2 0 0 9
The International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration
http://www.wikisym.org/ws2009/
October 25-27 in Orlando, Florida, USA
In-cooperation with ACM SIGPLAN and ACM SIGWEB, co-located with ACM
OOPSLA 2009, peer-reviewed and archived in the ACM Digital Library
========================================================
The International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym) is the premier conference
dedicated to wikis and related open collaboration systems and processes.
WikiSym 2009 aims to explore and extend the thriving wiki community,
bringing together researchers, practitioners, writers and scholars to
gather, discuss and share knowledge and experience on all areas related
to wikis and wiki philosophy, ranging from social to technical, and from
theoretical to experience studies.
The symposium combines a rigorously reviewed research paper track with
plenty of space for experience reports, discussions of work in progress,
demonstrations, tutorials, and lively informal last minute sessions in
open space and WikiFest sessions.
This year, WikiSym will be held in Orlando, Florida, USA---a city with a
tropical climate, poolside fruity drinks, and world-class entertainment
opportunities for adults and families.
== IMPORTANT DATES ==
* March 27th: Submission deadline for research papers, experience
reports, workshops, and panels
* April 24th: Submission deadline for posters, demonstrations, WikiFest
and Doctoral Symposium proposals
* May 22nd: Notifications for all submission categories (workshops earlier)
* October 25-27: WikiSym 2009!
== TOPICS OF INTEREST ==
WikiSym welcomes submissions of research papers (long and short),
experience reports, workshops, panels, posters, demonstrations, WikiFest
and Doctoral Symposium proposals.
Given the interdisciplinary nature of wiki and related systems, WikiSym
invites contributions in a wide range of fields:
* computer science and technology
* human-computer interaction
* communications and media studies
* education
* information and library science
* history, political science, geography
* linguistics, discourse analysis, language studies
* business, marketing, law
* natural sciences, medicine
Topics of special interest to the symposium include, but are not limited to:
* social software for collaboration and work group processes
* wiki user experiences, usability, and discourse analysis
* reputation systems, quality assurance processes
* scalability---social and technical
* wiki technologies and implementations
* translation and multilingual wiki content
* educational applications
* wiki for non-textual media (images, video, audio)
* content dynamics and wiki evolution
* wiki journalism
* wiki archiving and versioning
* wiki administration: dealing with abuse and resolving conflict
* wiki and the semantic web, knowledge management, tacit knowledge
* wiki for small audiences (departmental and family wikis)
* legal issues (copyright, licensing)
* visualization of wiki structure
* wiki fiction
== RESEARCH PAPERS ==
Research papers present integrative reviews or original reports of
substantive new work: theoretical, empirical, or in the development or
deployment of novel systems. We encourage emphasizing lessons learned
and providing a clear concise message to the audience about the
relevance of the work. The paper must place your work in context within
the field, citing related work and indicating clearly what aspects of
the work are new.
Research papers will be reviewed by the Program Committee to meet
rigorous academic standards of publication. They should be written in
English and must not exceed 10 pages (for full papers) or 4 pages (for
short papers). Papers will be reviewed both with respect to conceptual
quality and clarity of presentation. Authors of accepted papers are
expected to attend the conference in order to present the paper.
Accepted submissions will be published in the WikiSym proceedings and
archived in the ACM Digital Library. Submitted papers should use the ACM
SIG Proceedings Format, see:
http://www.acm.org/sigs/pubs/proceed/template.html
== EXPERIENCE REPORTS ==
Experience reports are an integral part of the conference program. These
reports provides a large group of peers the opportunity to learn from a
project's experience; they explore how concepts that sound good on paper
(and at conferences!) work on real projects. They are a valuable means
of communicating experiences, especially at the "bleeding edge". Many
attendees want to find out what it is like to start a company wiki, use
a wiki in classroom education, or build a political campaign around a
wiki. Experience reports present experience and reflections, together
with supporting evidence for any claims made. And they particularly
include reports that discuss both benefits and drawbacks of the
approaches used. Reports may focus on a particular aspect of technology
usage and practice, or describe broad project experiences. Some reports
focus on people, process or related challenges.
== WORKSHOPS ==
Workshops provide an opportunity for researchers and practitioners to
discuss and learn about topics that require extended engagement such as
new systems, research methods, standards and formats. A workshop should
require participants to engage with each other for at least half a day.
For shorter sessions, please consider WikiSym's open space format. A
workshop proposal should consist of approximately two pages describing
what you intend to do and how your session will meet the criteria
described above. It should include a concise abstract, proposed time
frame (half-day, full-day) and one-paragraph biographies of all people
relevant to the submission. Workshop proposals will be reviewed and
selected for their interest to the community. Each workshop will be
allocated a half-day or a full-day and a room.
== PANELS ==
Panels provide an interactive forum for bringing together people with
interesting points of view to discuss compelling wiki issues. Panels
involve participation from both the panelists and audience members in a
lively discussion. Proposals for panels should consist of approximately
two pages describing what you intend to do and how your session will
meet the criteria described above. It should include a concise abstract
and one-paragraph biographies of all people relevant to the submission.
A panel submission will be reviewed and selected for their interest to
the community. Each panel will be given a 90-minute time slot.
== POSTERS ==
Poster presentations enable researchers to present late-breaking
results, significant work in progress, or work that is best communicated
in conversation. WikiSym's lively poster sessions let conference
attendees exchange ideas one-on-one with authors, and let authors
discuss their work in detail with those attendees most deeply interested
in the topic.
Poster proposals may describe original research, engineering, or
experience reports. Submissions should consist of two page extended
abstract outlining the content of the poster. Successful applicants will
be invited display a poster, 1x2m in size, at a special plenary session
of the Symposium.
== DEMONSTRATIONS ==
Wikis are intended to be used, and no format is better suited for
demonstrating the utility of new wiki research and technology than
showing and using it. If you would like to demonstrate new features or
products, this is the place! Demonstrations give presenters an
opportunity to show running systems and gather feedback. Demo
submissions will be reviewed based on their relevance to the community.
A submission should be one page in length, with a title, and a short
description of the demo. The description should include what you plan
to demo, what you hope to get out of demoing, and how the audience will
benefit. A short note of any special technical requirements may be included.
== WIKI FEST ==
WikiFest is a conference session devoted to helping you start and grow a
successful wiki in your organization. Proposals should showcase a wiki
adoption strategy or example, with emphasis on how others can apply your
strategy to their own wiki.
Topics to be covered:
* Tools---Choose the right wiki software for your needs
* Adoption---How to run a pilot, establish a core group of users, and
grow usage.
* Uses---How does your team use a wiki? How has it helped your productivity?
* Obstacles---What are they, and how can you avoid or fix them?
== DOCTORAL SYMPOSIUM ==
The Doctoral Symposium is an interactive forum for doctoral students to
receive present and discuss their doctoral work. Students who are at
least one year away from dissertation completion are invited to submit
to the Doctoral Symposium. Students beginning their research are
especially invited to attend.
To submit a proposal send a 2-3 pages description of your dissertation
research, including:
* A description of your work
* The goals---what contributions will your research generate?
* The approach---what is being performed to achieve the goals? How will
results be validated?
Additionally, your adviser must send a brief statement of your
dissertation progress to date and a statement of recommendation to the
Doctoral Symposium chair.
== HOW TO SUBMIT ==
Please submit your papers or proposals in PDF format through our
submission system at the WikiSym website (available in early 2009).
* http://www.wikisym.org/ws2009
All accepted submissions will be published in the proceedings and
archived in the ACM Digital Library. Submitted work of all categories
should use the ACM SIG Proceedings Format, see:
http://www.acm.org/sigs/pubs/proceed/template.html
Questions regarding submissions may be directed at the respective chair
using the following email addresses:
* Research papers: papers(a)wikisym.org
* Experience reports: reports(a)wikisym.org
* Panels: panels(a)wikisym.org
* Workshops: workshops(a)wikisym.org
* Demonstrations: demos(a)wikisym.org
* Posters: posters(a)wikisym.org
* WikiFest: wikifest(a)wikisym.org
* Doctoral Symposium: docsym(a)wikisym.org
General questions should be directed at chair(a)wikisym.org.
== SYMPOSIUM COMMITTEE ==
* Dirk Riehle, SAP Labs LLC, USA, Symposium Chair
* Amy Bruckman, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA, Program Chair
* Ademar Aguiar, FEUP, Universidade do Porto, Portugal, Sponsorships Chair
* Luca de Alfaro, University of California at Santa Cruz, USA, Doctoral
Symposium Chair
* Claus Atzenbeck, Aalborg University Esbjerg, Denmark, Posters Chair
* Phoebe Ayers, University of California at Davis, Wikimedia Liason
* Robert Biddle, Carleton University, Experience Reports Chair
* Martin Cleaver, Blended Perspectives, Canada, Publicity Co-Chair
* Ward Cunningham, AboutUs.org and Cunningham & Cunningham, USA,
Honorary Member
* Alain Desilets, National Research Council of Canada, Canada, Tutorials
Chair
* Ted Ernst, AboutUs.org, USA, Open Space Facilitator
* Marc Laporte, TikiWiki CMS/Groupware, Webmaster
* Stewart Mader, Future Changes, WikiFest Chair
* James Noble, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, Honorary
Member
* Felipe Ortega, Rey Juan Carlos University, Spain, Publicity Co-Chair
* Sebastien Paquet, Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Canada, Panels Chair
* Pattarawan Prasarnphanich, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand,
Demonstrations Chair
* Christian Wagner, City University of Hong Kong, China, Workshops Chair
== PROGRAM COMMITTEE ==
* Ademar Aguiar, FEUP, Universidade do Porto, Portugal
* Luca de Alfaro, University of California at Santa Cruz, USA
* Panagiota Alevizou, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK
* Mark Bernstein, Eastgate Systems, USA
* Robert Biddle, Carleton University, Canada
* Amy Bruckman, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
* Thomas N. Burg, BlogTalk, Socialware, MindMeister, Austria
* Ed H. Chi, PARC, USA
* Ulrike Cress, Knowledge Media Research Center, Tuebingen, Germany
* Kevin Crowston, Syracuse University, USA
* Chris Dent, Peermore Limited, UK
* Alain Desilets, National Research Council of Canada, Canada
* Andrea Forte, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
* Frank Fuchs-Kittowski, Fraunhofer ISST, Germany
* Andreea D. Gorbatai, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, USA
* Susan C. Herring, Indiana University, USA
* Brian Ingerson, Socialtext, USA
* Benjamin Mako-Hill, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
* Aniket Kittur, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
* Marc Laporte, TikiWiki CMS/Groupware, Canada
* Sky Marsen, Macquarie University, Australia
* David W. McDonald, University of Washington, USA
* Paulo Merson, Software Engineering Institute, USA
* David Millard, University of Southampton, UK
* Stuart Moulthrop, University of Baltimore, USA
* Pattarawan Prasarnphanich, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
* Joseph Reagle, New York University, USA
* Camille Roth, CNRS, France
* Frank Shipman, Texas A&M University, USA
* Dario Taraborelli, University of Surrey, UK
* Fernanda B. Viegas, IBM Research, USA
--
* I use this address for lists; send personal messages to phoebe.ayers
<at> gmail.com *
In some time zones, it was done before 2009. And this is the most
successful fundraising.
I think that we have two conclusions from this fundraising:
* Jimmy should make appeal earlier as WMF will need more money the
next year + people will have less money because of the whole year of
recession.
* It would be good to find local prominent people who would write
their own appeals for particular audiences. For example, prominent
persons from France and Germany...
A week ago I published new wikistats files, for the first time in 7 months,
only to retract them 2 days later, when it turned out that counts for some
wikis were completely wrong. After some serious bug hunting I nailed the
creepy creature that had been hiding in an unexpected corner (most bugs find
refuge there and yet it is still the last place to look).
New files have been generated and uploaded for most projects. The wikistats
job for Wikipedia has another 10-12 days to go, but intermediate results
have been published, and I will refresh these every one or two days till new
counts for all Wikipedias are online (as always with English as exception).
For an explanation of what went wrong and direct links to new files see
http://infodisiac.com/blog/2008/12/wikistats-is-back/
Erik Zachte
Hello,
I've been browsing the list archive, meta and some talk pages on the
English and Spanish Wikipedias to find more information about what's
going to happen with the license of their contents. I think this subject
should be more publicly available, especially for the administrators of
Wikipedia-compatible wikis.
I started to build a Wikipedia-compatible (in license) wiki project a
year ago and wanted to make it public this month, but with all this
about the new version of the GFDL and the possible license update I
don't know what to do; and I'm pretty sure many people are in the same
situation as me.
So, what's going to happen and what should we do?
Thanks,
Isaac (Isb1009 on Wikimedia sites)