Having to manually update Google+ is a serious negative for its use: volunteer time is a very precious resource.  Simply because other groups (most of which have paid employees) are doing it doesn&#39;t mean that every group ought to invest its limited resources in doing so.  It&#39;s not a popular site, it&#39;s resource-intensive to maintain, and most of the target audience on Google+ is also present on at least one of the other locations that are regularly being maintained.  I&#39;d not consider it a priority.<br>
<br>Risker/Anne<br>