I agree, once the lists are set up properly,
there are also some
tools that could help you identify images (if they are tagged with the
identifier in Commons), and add them to the lists.
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/8/23 Michael Maggs <Michael(a)maggs.name>
Adding images is probably of lesser importance
for the moment, at least for the start of WLM.
Michael
On 23 Aug 2013, at 10:18, Andrew Gray wrote:
Thanks :-)
The upshot is that we now have basic Category A lists for both Edinburgh and Glasgow.
Glasgow is mostly cleaned up, but I only scratched the surface of Edinburgh; I can finish
it this weekend, all being well.
Still to be done for both pages:
* Introductory "survey"
* Coordinates for monuments
* Lots more pictures (I only did the ones with obvious WP articles)
Coordinates already exist in the "comprehensive" lists so could perhaps be
copied over by a bot. Any volunteers to try coding something?
Next task will be to link together all the Cat A and "comprehensive by parish"
lists for Scotland, but the key structure for WLM is at least in place.
A.
On 23 August 2013 09:22, Michael Maggs <Michael(a)maggs.name> wrote:
> Thanks for the fantastic work you have been doing on the Scottish lists, Andrew. I
think you have saved the day!
>
> Michael
>
> On 21 Aug 2013, at 09:26, Andrew Gray wrote:
>
>> For Scotland, the problem is that there are existing lists with a lot of detail -
notes, detailed addresses, & coordinates - and copying them over takes some time;
there's also been a bit of churn since these were generated, meaning ~1% of entries
have been upgraded from B to A (and are new) or have been delisted from A (and need
removed). It's nothing overly complex, just a little tricky.
>>
>> I've generated "new" list templates for each area from Katie's
data and I'm copying the details across by hand into this new framework before pasting
them in. Happy to provide these blanks if anyone's interested. I think with a solid
block of work this weekend by perhaps three or four people we will be able to launch north
of the border.
>>
>> NI looks bad but is probably one afternoon's work to complete - they're
pretty small lists.
>>
>> (Glasgow and Edinburgh are going to be an interesting challenge, though; I
haven't yet had time to figure out what the current state of affairs is with these two
cities.)
>>
>> A.
>>
>> On 21 August 2013 09:05, Michael Maggs <Michael(a)maggs.name> wrote:
>>
>>> I am not sure who has been working on the Scottish and Northern Ireland lists
recently. I’ve seen that Andrew has done some work in Scotland, but he may not have
enough time to complete this on his own.
>>>
>>> Since virtually none of the Scottish lists are up yet, and only about half of
the Northern Ireland lists, I have to ask (sorry!) whether it is truly realistic for us to
launch the UK competition in those countries. Wales is finished, and although England
still needs more work the competition could at least go ahead in many English counties.
>>>
>>> I don’t want to be too negative about this, but we have to be sensible. It
will look bad if we launch in Scotland and Northern Ireland only to have to admit that
there is no way to upload from Wikipedia. One of the main purposes of the competition is
to get new editors, and they will never able able to contribute if they have no easy
access to the upload wizard from a Wikipedia page.
>>>
>>> COULD I PLEASE ASK THAT EVERYONE WHO IS ABLE TO WORK ON THE UK LISTS OVER THE
NEXT WEEK MAKE THEMSELVES KNOWN HERE, AND INDICATE WHAT MIGHT BE DOABLE OVER THAT PERIOD?
>>>
>>> I am cross-posting to the International list as well, in case anyone is able
to provide some final assistance for us.
>>>
>>> Michael
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Wlm2013-l mailing list
Wlm2013-l(a)wikimedia.org.uk
http://lists.wikimedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/wlm2013-l [1]
_______________________________________________
Wlm2013-l mailing list
Wlm2013-l(a)wikimedia.org.uk