2015-07-26 18:28 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk>:
On 26 July 2015 at 16:34, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki@gmail.com> wrote:

> A way can be found, but there are multiple issues to solve:
> 1) the name of the object may not be unique hence we may be unable to
> satisfy Wikidata requirements on label/description uniqueness,

Wikidata does not require unique names.

Label are indeed unique but you can add as many alias as you want (see french label on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3533061 ). You just need to choose a primary one, is it a problem ?

> 3) it must be fine to create items that contain no information other than
> the name;

No, this is not OK (and they may be deleted); but nor is it necessary.

Why on Earth would someone like to tell nothing but the name ?
A lot of properties are very easy to add (P31, P17, P1435, P131, etc.) ; plus, there is some semi-automatic tools to to that « en masse ».
 
> 4) it must be as easy to add coordinates to multiple items as it is with an
> on-wiki table;

Why?

Can't https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/quick_statements.php do that ? (QuickStatements is a wonderful tool but I struggle a little to use it to its full extent).

> 6) it must be easy to publish new groups of items on the go, because the
> list is built gradually (and very slowly) as we get new authorisations;

It is.

> 7) there must be a way to automatically make an on-wiki table of items by
> region (currently I'm not even sure we can make an on-wiki table of
> "municipalities of Emilia-Romagna" with Wikidata? let alone listing items
> which have some connection to them through N levels of P31, P1435, P279 or
> whatever);

This is, I believe, possible. For example:

   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Wikidata_lists/Items_with_ORCIDs

is built by a bot.

--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk