My idea of making the number of jury members in a particular round infinite, was that we could hand out a jury token to each community member easily, and let them process 100-1000 images. If enough people do that, and if the distribution is either random or based on the pictures that have the least votes, that should give a somewhat (not perfect) workflow. 

Hope that makes sense,

Lodewijk

2012/8/7 Platonides <platonides@gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Lodewijk <lodewijk@effeietsanders.org> wrote:
> Bumping this thread up, as I'm getting more and more questions about jury
> tools.
>
> Is someone able to take the work that Nuno has done already, and rework it
> into a tool that allows easy juring without distributing them over jury
> members? Also, a question I got several times is to allow infinite jury
> members, basically to make a community round easier.
>
> Best,
>
> Lodewijk

IMHO you would need dedication from such juries to review at least N
images, with N being a big number, usually either the full image list
or a big share of them. Fair ranking of many juries with small votes
in non-trivial cases looks hard, so although support for "infinite
jury members" should be simple (with the juries looking at many
photos), I don't think it would solve making a community round.

_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org