On 10/19/05, Ryan Delaney <ryan.delaney(a)gmail.com> wrote: Ryan, I can think of three, and I don't mean people who I disagree with for some reason, but who are in my view fundamentally unsuited, two of whom went on to misbehave. It wouldn't be right to name them, but it's worrying, and I feel I've noticed more of it lately. Voters seem to think they need a reason to oppose someone, but not a reason to elect them: the "no big deal" attitude. I agree with everyone who's spoken out against IP addresses being accessed on the basis of elections. Sarah

On 10/19/05, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote: Can't find an SI unit for measureing how well people get along with others (there is that EQ thing but I don't think that is too relivant). -- geni

Looking at [[List of strange units of measurement]], the only one I can find that's even remotly close is the "herm", but unfortunatly that's a) rather sexist, and b) only works when measuring womes ability to get along with others. Also, c) it's rather sexist. --gkhan On 10/19/05, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com> wrote: