On 7/26/07, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/26/07, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Why don't you not spend your effort attacking
the work of others?
Such articles tend to not follow Wikipedia core policies such as NPOV
very well. Arguably this is cause for a rewrite rather than deletion,
but sometimes ...
-Matt
There's clearly no intention of rewriting at least one of these
neutrally. Neutrality when it comes to American political parties
does not seem to be well done on Wikipedia, and I avoid these
articles.
Also, these articles could be written neutrally, would be much better
articles, and would not reek of what they are, abuse of Wikipedia as a
soapbox. But, while many of these and related articles are so overtly
biased, they do tend to look like just what they are.
A disclaimer, I've only read the one, and a handful of others, and
don't intend to go back to it--and the owners know their biases quite
well.
KP