You're off-topic, the text in question relates to ozone depletion, not to
global warming.
Fred
From: "Poor, Edmund W"
<Edmund.W.Poor(a)abc.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:50:16 -0500
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Subject: RE: [WikiEN-l] William Connelley no longer neutral contributor (Re:
toJimbo)
Alan asks:
Here the question is - does nearly every expert
in whatever field "global warming" falls under
(environmental science, or whatever) accept
William Connolley's claim? I don't know yet.
That's precisely the question we've been trying to answer, and the two
points of view are:
* The Democratic Party of the US, along with the Clinton EPA and the
UN's climate panel (IPCC) say that "nearly every expert" accepts the GW
theory (which William also supports).
* Others, like Bush (a politician); Lindzen and Balunias (scientists),
Singer and Seitz (retired scientists) that that "less than half of all
experts" accept the GW theory.
So there is a dispute over whether there is a consensus about a theory.
Is that clear now?
Uncle Ed
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l