On 12/6/06, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Well, I guess I'm mostly sympathetic to that view.
I didn't think the
creation of free images was a core goal of Wikipedia. Rather, having a
ready supply of usable images - free or otherwise - was. I don't feel
strongly about it as long as the effort of producing free images
doesn't distract us too much.
::just about falls over::
Yes, the creation of free images is a core goal of Wikipedia. It even
says so in the mission statement on
wikimediafoundation.org: "The
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. is an international nonprofit organization
dedicated to encouraging the growth, development and distribution of
free, multilingual content..." Images are content, too, and judging by
the debate over this I'd say it's considered a fairly important part
of it!
There are plenty of reference materials on the web available at no
cost to view; what makes Wikipedia's mission different and important
is its being free-as-in-speech rather than simply at no charge.
I don't propose that we get rid of *all* unfree or insufficiently-free
content; there are cases where our use is legitimately fair. But we do
use it far more than we ought to, without sufficient justification,
and I think it hurts the goal of "growth, development, and
distribution" of truly free content to use it where a replacement
could reasonably be found. (I know at least a few people who are not
motivated to take their own photos for an article if they see the
article has one already; do you check the copyright status of images
every time you browse to see if one may be something you ought to
replace?)
We don't just use *text* on subjects that are hard to research from
accessible sources, even should they give permission to reprint on
Wikipedia or noncommercial use only. Why don't we, if our goal really
is simply a steady supply of articles? I can only say that it isn't.
We quote fairly from works where we need to in order to write about
them, but otherwise are strictly free content.
Being free of immediate legal concerns is a bare minimum, but if
that's all we're doing I think we're failing at our mission.
-Kat
who is, unfortunately, not a very good photographer
--
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mindspillage | (G)AIM:Mindspillage
mindspillage or mind|wandering on
irc.freenode.net | email for phone
The good traveller has no fixed plans, and is not intent on arriving
-- Lao-Tzu | Support Wikimedia:
http://www.wikimediafoundation.org