On 02/03/2008, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/03/2008, WJhonson(a)aol.com
<WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
> "Replaceable" is a very tenuous term.
> If we have no free-use image, we should be and are free to use a fair-use
> image
> *until* such time as we do have a free-use image.
We tried that. Our living people bios ended up lousy
with copyvios
with fair use tags and no one really looked for free replacements.
Indeed. Whereas no non-free images on living bios (with some very rare
exceptions in the cases of noted recluses, e.g. [[J. D. Salinger]])
and placeholders saying "Replace this image" has gotten us at least
usable and, in some cases, high-quality promotional images (e.g. [[Vox
Day]] releasing one of his promo images under GFDL because he saw the
placeholder on his article).
So a fairly hard-arsed policy of (almost) no non-free images on living
bios notably works to get us, and hence the world, more free content,
often quite good free content. And once it's free content, it's free
forever [*].
[*] barring retrospective changes to copyright law, e.g. theft from
the public domain by means of term extension.
- d.
- d.