So if you're verbose in the name of Liberalism, that's "wordy" and bad,
but
if you're verbose in the name of Conservatism, that's "strong" and
good?
check. I'll remember that. I'd hate to be verbose for all the wrong reasons.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Sidaway" <tonysidaway(a)gmail.com>
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia: "a liberal cesspool of
fact-checking,sources and citations"
On 10/6/09, Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
"Prefer Conciseness over Liberal Wordiness" is pretty good though
(scroll down).
That's a doozy.
Note also that principle 4, "Utilize Powerful Conservative Terms",
links to another of Schlafly's crackpot projects, to prove that since
1612, "Powerful, insightful new conservative terms have grown at a
geometric rate, roughly doubling every century"
http://conservapedia.com/Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Terms
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.420 / Virus Database: 270.14.4/2417 - Release Date: 10/06/09
06:50:00