On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:14 PM, crock spot <crockspot(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Can you cite a source for that Nathan? I'd like to
read about that.
Don't be surprised if this whole thing turns out to be a hoax perpetrated
by
Limbaugh himself, and bites Wikipedia in the ass. This
bears a striking
resemblance to something Rush has long complained about: "sourced"
comments
attributed to him that were on Wikipedia.
Glenn Beck recently planted a small hoax on his radio show, expecting
Media
Matters to take the bait, and they did.
I suspect Limbaugh will end up having the last laugh, and it will be at
Wikipedia's expense.
Crockspot
Sure, I can cite a source.
"Kit Carson, a spokesman for Mr. Limbaugh, said a staff researcher had found
the information in an article on the Pensacola newspaper’s Web site, and not
on Wikipedia. But Ginny Graybiel, the paper’s managing editor, said it had
never published such material."[1]
~Nathan
1: Link <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/16/us/16judge.html> Kevin Sack, Sept
15 2010, New York Times.