I'm not sure about the particulars, but my feeling is that the Vatican is
suggesting that it's always been copyrighted, and now they're just going to
enforce it.
Wikipedia/Wikisource doesn't make a profit itself, but in this situation I
don't see the Vatican agreeing to the commercial redistribution portion
of GFDL.
-k
On 1/25/06, Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Katefan0 wrote:
All,
CNN this morning was reporting that the Vatican has decided to assert
copyright on basically all papal communications (speeches, encyclicals,
etc.) made by every pope during the last 50 years, with the exception of
"the news media." I don't know how much material we might have that
could
fall afoul of this new declaration, or whether
the Vatican would
consider
Wikipedia and Wikisource under that umbrella, but
someone more familiar
with
Catholic information in Wikimedia areas should
probably get involved.
I don't know if there's any reason to think the Vatican would be willing
to
grant a PD or GFDL licensing exception for
Wikipedia. The spokesman said
that "newspapers have the right to publish texts as news" (such as
encyclicals), presumably because there's no profit made specifically
from
their use. But I'm not sure how this would
apply to WP or WS.
-k
http://www.forbes.com/technology/feeds/ap/2006/01/25/ap2475804.html
_______________________________________________
...
Is that legal to retrospectively apply a copyright on communications ?
...
I must say I am abashed by this news...I seem to remember that the key
point of a religion was to carry on a deity words so as to ensure a good
number of believers...
Weird
ant
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l