Ray Saintonge wrote
Slim Virgin wrote:
>On 3/23/07, Sheldon Rampton <sheldon(a)prwatch.org> wrote:
>>Wikipedia is a big enough topic that it
attracts all kinds of
>>reporters, all kinds of criticism and all kinds of praise. Overall, I
>>think it has gotten fairly sympathetic press.
>Yes, indeed, though I sense that's coming to
an end.
Yeah. The alternative would be for the reporters to
learn what putting
Wikipedia in proper perspective means. They might even have to check
their facts. That would not be the easy way out for them. :-)
Sheldon is talking good sense, Sarah and Ray are not. The press will print bad-news
stories about WP, but that's because such stories are _news_. As David Gerard has just
said, the hacks like WP and are well disposed towards us. That doesn't mean they are
obliged to make propaganda for WP. If you take open-source software as a comparison, I
doubt mainstream journalism has ever had the slightest interest in putting that in
"proper perspective". With that as baseline, WP has already done well. A single
story about citation in college work probably will have more thoughtful content than you
could find about Linux distributions in a month of Sundays.
Charles
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from
www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam