Guy Chapman aka JzG Sun Nov 11 20:57:17 UTC 2007
>On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:41:33 +0100, Raphael Wegmann
wrote:
>We won't stop before we get precisely what we
want either.
Which is a verifiably neutral encyclopaedia.
Daniel R. Tobias * Sat Nov 10 21:06:33 UTC 2007*
On 10 Nov 2007 at 16:37:33 +0000, Guy Chapman aka JzG
wrote:
>* Fact is, I am getting just a little bit tired of the fact that some*
*
*>>* people give a very strong appearance of extending a greater*
* *>>* assumption of good faith towards the likes of Bagley and Barber than*
* *>>* they do towards those of us who work to protect the project form the*
**>>* pernicious influence of such people.*
And Senator McCarthy, I'm sure, was tired of the
fact that some
people seemed to be extending more assumptions of good faith towards
the communists than towards those like the Senator who worked to
protect the country from their pernicious influence. Nevertheless,
even if it caused one to be categorized as a communist sympathizer
for saying so (and even if many of the people saying so *were* in
fact sympathizers of communist ideology), it was in fact true that
the actions taken by the likes of the Senator in the name of
protecting the American system against communism were in fact
undermining some important things about the American system such as
freedom to hold and express opinions.
What a joke. Verifiable? When I came to Wikipedia, nuclear scientists were
on the Hollywood Ten list, and Joe Mccarthy was on HUAC. I got stalked,
harrassed, defamed, and banned for trying to improve the entries.