Apologies,
Upon review, his previous revert was more than 24 hours earlier. I don't know what
the time frame of his pledge was, but perhaps this was outside it.
-- Silverback
-------------- Original message --------------
In researching the criteria for blocking and its
abuse, I noticed that 172 has
an issue before arbitrarion. A point that seemed to count in his favor was his
taking of the one revert pledge. Note that he was one of the reverters making
alleging that my post was original research, evidently common sense application
of the meaning of words is not allowed. He just reverted my contribution again,
his second in a few hours.
Integrity should require the votes on that issue to be reversed, since his
pledge was meaningless.
Hopefully, we can work together to make wikipedia open and accountable.
-- thanx,
Silverback
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l