On 28/06/07, Luna <lunasantin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Interesting. I'll see if I can snag a copy, at some point.
In my own experience, I tend to agree that things are usually caught
pretty
quickly (minutes), after a few days or weeks, or essentially never. The
"regular" RC patrol and anti-vandalism bots are excellent at catching
sudden
and large changes which are obviously problematic, but more subtle changes
usually get caught by editors diligently checking their watchlists for
articles they've worked on or particularly care about. In my opinion,
anyway.
Problems can come up, when two vandals hit the same page, whether in quick
or slow succession; if the first change is subtle, and the second is
blatant, then more often than not a bot or RC patroller will revert only
the
later change, and will neglect to even check the first. We need to
encourage
people to check over the pages they revert, to see if they may have missed
any lingering vandalism.
Speed is good. Our main advantages, in my opinion, are in numbers and
tools.
We should use them to our best advantage. Increase awareness of tools,
even
just of page history, user contribs, and the ability to report vandals,
and
even common laypeople can help us keep things clean.
I personally am interested in two main areas, here: improving our
mechanisms
to help experienced users detect vandals, and educating the public as to
the
available tools and options for dealing with vandals.
Bit of a ramble, I guess. I keep telling myself I'll provide some useful
coding, once I have a bit more education in that area, so hopefully I'm
still involved with WMF when that day comes.
-Luna
_______________________________________________
There are some great tools like VP where you can wipe out 10 quick "Adam
Gardner dances like a girl" type edits, but most of those get spotted by
ordinary ppl in RC before you have chance to hit a button. The subtle
changes that dont flag so easily are hard to spot with any tool. most ppl
are suspicious of IPs and new users but its the silent vandalism that is a
problem, a few minor changes and a summary with "ooops typo" are the vandals
greatest tool. a few clean edits and bang - 5 edits before x has changed
aquited to convicted!
Mike