On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 20:33:03 +0000, <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com>
wrote:
> And I don't think denying that there is a
problem will make there
> not be a problem either :-)
Oh no. But I was first to saying there's a problem.
And I think my problem is (a) more serious than a backlog that isn't backlogged, and
(b) speaks directly to the mission, not to people's more-or-less justified anxieties.
Well now, I think I'm also in with the mission. The mission is to
create a reliable, credible free encyclopaedia, right? And we have
a million editors, who probably have most of a million different
visions of what that would look like.
Still, I don't think I'll carry on this particular thread of debate.
It seems unlikely we will ever agree on this, perhaps because of our
different backgrounds and histories.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG