Ray Saintonge wrote
After reading through that article and its talk page I
can only regard
it as so much excess verbiage to be cut severely.
The page was created by amalgamating two, one of which was the old 'vanity'
guideline, the other a page on COI created in September and with obvious gaps. The result
has had several drastic haircuts since. More concision work required? Yes, but satisfying
the need to have a comprehensive guideline comes before boiling it right down. People do
dicker on so, making ridculous extrapolations, if you make it very simple.
The problem with my
getting involved in such a page is that I would waste a lot of time
arguing over things that have little bearing on what I prefer to do.
Better stick to wikien then.
Charles
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from
www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit
www.ntlworld.com/security for more information