On Tuesday 13 November 2007 10:26, joshua.zelinsky(a)yale.edu wrote:
Quoting Kurt Maxwell Weber <kmw(a)armory.com>om>:
Frankly, I think NOR is a horrible idea and needs
to go.
And how do you detemine which original research should go in articles
and which
shouldnt"
Lots of ways...peer review for academic subjects; community discussion for
everything else.
There are other possibilities, too. Just whatever works best.
I also
think NPOV is
somewhat msiguided and could do with severe modification.
Ok, that's the point where we kindly ask you to fork.
Why?
As long as the contributions I make to articlespace are in line with what's
currently accepted, what's wrong with working to change that for the future?
--
Kurt Weber
<kmw(a)armory.com>