Flame Viper wrote:
You're not helping, at all. Stop begging for
me to be moderated for The Truth, wake up, and smell the corrodite. Unless you can't
handle the truth?
Hi. This post is inflammatory and content-free. If your goal is to be
heard on points you think are important to Wikipedia's success, posts
like this are harming your cause. To the extent people agree with you,
you are harming their causes, too.
If your goal is to create drama, then I would be much obliged if you did
it on one of the many parts of the internet where drama is welcome, or
even the goal.
Thank you for that assessment. I read the "Four things", and they had
both good ideas and the provocations quoted above. What people like
Flame Viper seem to ignore is that a single viperine injection can
obscure a long list of positive suggestions. Wounded animals focus
their attention on the source of pain.
If these people are really arguing for a more liberalized governance of
Wikipedia they should not work so hard at giving ammunition to their
opponents.
Ec