On Mar 6, 2006, at 1:28 PM, STEFAN CLAUDIU TIULEA
wrote:
Excuse me, but you were the one who replied to
one
of
my messages, and in that message, I was referring
to
nicknames -- not userpages. In that case, it was
you
who went off-topic, not I. I talked about the
nickname. If you want to talk about userpages, do
so,
but don't reply to one of my messages where I
talk
about nicknames! And don't be rude to people!
I just checked my records, and you are mistaken,
although since this
thread was originally about usernames and branched
out several side
discussions, any confusion is understandable.
For your convenience, here is the conversation, in
order:
Cunctuator:
I think it's appropriate to Wikipedians to
express
their opinions
about the governance and rules of Wikipedia on
their userpage.
Phil:
It's appropriate for Wikipedians to express
their
opinions about the
governance and rules of Wikipedia on their
userpage. It's
inappropriate for them to do so in an infantile
fashion. That applies
to you and to Freakofnurture.
Stefan:
Is it what you say official? If it is, then I
would
like to see this policy. Or perhaps you are
Jimbo's
right hand and have the authority to say what is,
and
what is not, appropriate. I think that the most
appropriate thing for people to do, is to mind
their
own business when something is not harming
anyone.
And
if Jimbo is Libertarian, as someone suggested in
the
past, then he should start acting like one.
Jimbo:
If you're asking me to assert an absolute
right of
infantile stupidity
and freedom to stalk and harass other users, then
you won't get it,
sorry.
Stefan:
If the condition of not harming others is
fulfilled,
as it was in this case, then people should be
allowed
to their business. That's my argument.
Phil:
Infantile userpages harm all of us by bringing
disrepute to the
community and to the project.
Stefan:
No, it doesn't. You just mind your own
business.
Whether you like a nickname or not, should not be
an
issue. Corny, annoying, and childish nicknames
should
> be allowed.
Okay, the way I see it is this: the discussion started
with a complaint about a nickname that was blocked. I
got involved and messaged that admin, etc. Somewhere
on the way, you guys started talking about userpages.
I don't know how it's possible to change the topic
like that and I don't read all messages, but anyway;
you said something about userpages and I made a reply,
and also mentioned Jimbo's name. My comment to Jimbo
was meant to refer to the original topic, i.e., the
nickname conflict. He then replied, and I replied back
to him, meaning for my comment to refer to the
nickname argument. You then thought that I replied to
the userpage argument, which is understandable,
because I didn't point out what I was referring to.
That's what caused the confusion and perhaps it was
mainly my fault, because I wasn't clear enough. It's
no biggie, tho. I just wish people would stay on topic
all the time.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around