On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:10 PM, <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
How do you propose to fix the line between these two
cases?
If you check our page on reliable sources I think it was (I worked on these
quite a while ago, can't quite remember where it was put), it already states
that we don't have to source things that are trivial, common knowledge, etc.
The problem is how to determine whether knowing how to use a particular
look-up table is really trivial, or should at the *minimum* be linked.
In any case your involvement in this discussion thus far has been very
POINTy. Though presumably that doesn't apply to the mailing lists,
it's still annoying as hell.
Are you on any one side in this discussion or are you just arguing for
the hell of it?
--
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crazycomputers