On 11/15/05, Michael Snow <wikipedia(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
If it's not GFDL, then it is by definition not a
fork of Wikipedia
content. Either that or it's a violation of the license.
--Michael Snow
As I said true forks are unlikely because the initial bulk of material
you pick up will be beyond your rescourses to handle. What you see are
the result of "wikipedia has some coverage of subject X but we want to
do it in a different way" sometimes this means more of it, sometimes
this means original reseach and some times this means POV.
--
geni