--- Robert <rkscience100(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Charle Podle is making things up.
Charle*s* Podle*s*. Please. And now that you've outed
me by using my real name, you must be banned
immediately!!!eleven!!! :)
I did *not* make my name public. EntmootsOfTrolls
did <snip>
So what about these messages, sent to a public mailing
list by "Robert K*****" and signed as "RK"?
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2002-December/008259.html
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2002-December/008294.html
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2002-December/008319.html
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2002-December/008329.html
I suppose EntmootsOfTrolls hijacked your account and
sent those e-mails. He's a tricksy one, he is.
<snip>
Robert wrote:
Charles wrote
falsehoods about
me, and ignores the point. I wonder how he would
react if
someone was bothering one of his friends or loved
ones? Oh
wait, that's different. As long as it is someone
else who
is outed and who feels threatened, that's Ok?
I still don't see how using a name you revealed in a
public forum is in any way a "threat" or "outing".
Perhaps you can explain?
No. Its morally wrong when it happens to anyone. It
is also
a violation of every norm of Wikipedia etiquette,
which
this list seems to have suddenly forgotten about. It
is
also probably illegal.
Using names which people themselves revealed is a
violation of every norm of Wikipedia etiquette?
So I suppose I should stop addressing every Wikipedian
who uses their real name by that selfsame real name,
lest I be banned, eh.
As to the legality of using a name someone revealed of
his own free will---I'm not a lawyer, so I won't
comment on that.
--Charles Podles ([[en:user:Mirv]])
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail