On 2/13/07, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/14/07, MacGyverMagic/Mgm
<macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ah, now I know what you mean, you are talking
about the duplication in the
notices.
Is he? I think he's saying that it makes sense that [[Barrel]] links
to [[Barrel (disambiguation)]], that [[Barrel (disambiguation)]] links
to [[Barrel (unit)]], but that there's no need to link from [[Barrel
(unit)]] back to [[Barrel (disambiguation)]].
I believe that the general pattern is for *those* links to not be
added, but I could be wrong.
Keep in mind that not everyone is arriving at these articles through
an internal link. If a reader searches for "barrel" on Google and
happens to click on the link to [[Barrel (unit)]], there should be an
obvious way for him to find the other meanings of the term once he
realizes that he's at the wrong article.
Kirill