2009/9/24 Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net>et>:
I wrote a bit about information planted in reliable
sources by
intelligence agencies a little while ago. Check this out:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/24/world/asia/24military.html
Why would we treat this any different from a press release by Wal-Mart?
It is rather transparently a message whispered in a parrot's ear and
intended to influence public opinion.
The NY Times has done exactly what we should do with information from
potentially biased sources - they have liberally sprinkled their
article with phrases like "senior American military and intelligence
officials say". Our articles would have to say "According to the NY
Times senior American military and intelligence officials say..." or
"The NY Times has reported American officials as saying...".