A [name omitted for privacy reasons] wrote:
It may be easy to criticize me, because I communicate
about the edit wars I am in. However, I think your
criticism would be far more useful if directed at
those who refuse to communicate.
The criticism Jimmy and I gave were highly constructive. What's bad
about that? ... I suppose if you are having problems accepting even
constructive criticism, then it's not much of a surprise that you are
having problems accepting a revert too (which is a form of criticism
that may or may not be constructive depending on the situation).
Never in my history here at the wikipedia, never has
someone replaced text of mine that was deleted --
To me, that would be an indication that the text should probably stay
deleted.
In any case, if you want to decrease the number of
edit wars -- allow people to have two watchlists, so
they can use one watchlist solely to watch articles at
which they are involved in an "edit crisis". This will
allow people the luxury of not having to worry that
they will forget about the incident.
I couldn't follow this paragraph at all, nor could I follow the logic in
your previous posting. I don't understand why you think the availability
of a second watchlist would encourage people to edit-war less.
Timwi