On 9/16/07, Wily D
<wilydoppelganger(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/16/07, K P <kpbotany(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 9/13/07, Wily D <wilydoppelganger(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > The short answer is: If I block someone, it's not like I have to
> > respond to their emails anyhow. While it'd be nice to enable an
> > email address - if I'm not taking emails, it'd be better if that was
> > clear, rather than dishonestly letting them sit in an "in" bin
> > forever. Anybody's who's been blocked can request a review from a
> > second admin anyhow {{unblock|reason}}
> >
> > WilyD
> >
> That's a rather hostile attitude to take towards the community of
> editors, that you can block, and their response to the block doesn't
> matter.
>
> "Start by finding out when your block will expire....
> If you do not wish to wait for your block to expire, you may contact
> the blocking administrator via email to resolve the problem that led
> to the block. To use this feature you must have a valid email address
> registered in your user preferences. If, after discussing the matter
> with them, you still believe your block is unfair, you may appeal the
> block by requesting that another administrator review your block.
>
> But it's a total lie that "you may contact the blocking administrator
> via e-mail to resolve the problem." Becaue you can't contact the
> blocking administrator via email and even if you can, they don't have
> to respond, and they're rather smug about telling everyone they're
> free to ignore you.
>
> What's wrong with this picture? Just about everything.
>
> So, in other words, it should say, "You may attempt to contact the
> blocking administrator via e-mail" but the blocking adminstrator is
> not required to have e-mail enabled, and might not respond to you, and
> damn proudly not respond, either.
>
> KP
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
KP
Please don't misunderstand me. I pre-emptively offer to undo almost
every block it's realistic for I'm involved in. I mostly get
criticising for offering to unblock people, not block them. And I
don't think anyone's going to fault me for not listening, even if I
might not ever be won over. Roughly speaking, the attitude I'm
presenting there is not my own, but I acknowledge that it may exist
and then what?
My point is just that requiring admins to enable email so people
they've blocked can email them is pointless. {{unblock|reason}} is by
far the best way to challenge an inappropriate block. Then you'll get
someone who is looking to review blocks. Not all admins *do* respond
to every request of them, sometimes for good reasons, maybe sometimes
for bad.
Regards
WilyD
But that's not what the instructions for unblock say. They say to
discuss it first with the blocking admin, and IF you do that are
unsuccessful you may then proceed to request a review. They don't say
use {{unblock|reason}}. By not enabling email you' ve denied people
you've blocked any access to requesting an unblock.
I've been blocked once, by an admin who has gone through a couple of
RFCs and an ArbCom. When I emailed a request to him to be unblocked
he posted nasty comments about my email, lied, to incite me on AN/I.
It was a stunning display of boorish and immature behaviour, though
certainly not unexpected from an admin who called an editor a douche.
If I could have bipassed e-mailing the little twirp, I certainly would
have, but it was clear that I was supposed to request unblock from the
little shit first.
Now you tell me you can't be bothered to even get e-mails. If the
policy requires you to email the blocking admin first in order to
appeal the block, then all blocking admins should enable their email.
Or admins should just admit that blocks are not appealable and they
have the power to do whatever they want regardless.
This is grossly insulting to us worthless little shit peon editors on
Wikipedia whatever the reason.
It is.
KP
The blocking message:
Start by finding out when your block will expire. Go to my
contributions and follow the Block log link at the top of the page. If
there are no blocks listed, or the latest one has already expired,
then you have been autoblocked. Please follow the instructions listed
in the section (on AutoBlocking) below.
If you do not wish to wait for your block to expire, you may contact
the blocking administrator via email to resolve the problem that led
to the block. To use this feature you must have a valid email address
registered in your user preferences. If, after discussing the matter
with them, you still believe your block is unfair, you may appeal the
block by requesting that another administrator review your block. To
do so, add
{{unblock|your reason here}}
to the bottom of your user talk page (which you can edit while
blocked, unless it is protected) to request unblocking. Please be
aware that abuse of this template will result in protection of that
page.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
KP
If you'll look at the list of admins without emails enabled, you'll
see my name isn't on the list. If you look through my block log,
you'll see I've reduced a block in response to an unblock request, and
that none of my other blocks have been undone by anyone.
Beyond that, I would agree the phrasing should be changed to suggest
the "best" practice should be to discuss it with the blocking admin,
who is probably far more likely to reverse or reduce the block than
anyone else is anyways, and that the "alternative" practice is the
unblock template.
Everything can be undone, any block can be appealed (including to the
unblock mailing list). I agree that your scenario might be grossly
insulting if it were true. But it's not. Blocks are easily
appealable.
In any event, I've fixed the blocking message.
Cheers,
WilyD