Risker wrote:
Hmmm...says it's redirected and protected to
prevent re-creation.
Shouldn't
that be pro-creation?
Considering that its origin is particularly due to dissatisfaction with
Wikipedia's presentation of issues like evolution and intelligent
design, why on earth would Conservapedia want to prevent pro-creation
viewpoints from being aired?
There were some 19th century communalist religious movements that sought
to prevent procreation among members. Over time this policy had serious
consequences on the growth of these communities.
Ec