Think about it this way...
In English Wikipedia's pool of 1.5 million articles, would Wikipedia really
be better if it kept an article about an association that no authority in
that field cared to do a bit of research about?
On 11/29/06, Silas Snider <swsnider(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/29/06, Guettarda <guettarda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/29/06, The Cunctator
<cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm mildly sorry for taking the shortcut of asking the list about
things
I
> could figure out by wading through the
insanely complicated policy
pages,
> but here goes-- if you think a page that
went through the AfD process
was
wrongly
deleted, what is the proper action?
How wrong is it for an admin to undelete a page?
It is a cardinal sin. If a page is deleted as a result of *fD it MUST
go
through DRV - despite the fact that
"Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy",
undeletion can only be done if the correct forms are filled out in
triplicate, lost, found again... (I can't remember the rest of how that
goes, but you end up having your house bulldozed).
In addition, DRV is the place where people comment, not on the merits of
the
deletion, but on whether the deletion was
"in process" or "out of
process".
It doesn't matter if the article was about
[[World War II]] and the
discussion only involved three people would voted delete on the grounds
of
"never heard of it", DRV is supposed to
comment on process, not merits
of
deletion (you'll be told "that's
what *fD is for, and you should have
commented when you had the chance).
<snip />
Wait...
I went and read our policy on undeletion ([[WP:UNDEL]]) , and it
definitely lists "If the article has been wrongly deleted (i.e. that
Wikipedia would be a better encyclopedia with the article restored). "
as a valid reason for undeletion (in fact, as the first reason). Given
that we 'know' that DRV is only for process auditing, I looked farther
down... behold! there is a section entitled "To request that a page
(or image) be restored", except that this section only tells you to
list the page on DRV... Catch -22 anyone?
Either we need to change WP:UNDEL to conform to current practice, or
we need to give quite a few people a cluebat beating.
Sincerely,
Silas Snider
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Silas Snider is a proud member of the Association of Wikipedians Who
Dislike Making Broad Judgements About the Worthiness of a General Category
of Article, and Who Are In Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad
Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They are Deletionist
(AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD) , and the Harmonious
Editing Club of Wikipedia.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l