Anthere – This isn’t a question of RK getting what he wants – the problem, as I see it, is that the entire argument has descended into “what Anthere wants” versus “what RK wants.”  That’s not the basis for good editing.

All of the information you had in the article is still there in the history, and can be put back in.  Protections are only temporary measures, and I added a comment at the top of the page so that readers know the article and its contents are in dispute.  I didn't look to see who had edited last -- it doesn't matter and is no reflection of opinion.

I really think you both should take a break, because this is way too personal.  If anybody wants to unlock the page, that's fine -- I may have overstepped wiki bounds by locking it in the first place.  But perhaps if you both leave it alone (and refrain from insults on the talk page), some more objective Wikipedians would have a chance to read all of the articles in question and work on the article from two points of view (pun intended): 

*Is this article consistent with other similar articles in content and format? (if so, fine, if not, then fix it)

*Is the current format (one article, many articles, whatever it is -- I forget) useful to a user who knows little and wants to find out more?  If so, good, if not, fix it. 

This seems to me to be a case where objective eyes would do the most good for the wikipedia AND the article.

Be peaceful.

J