Hi all, We did yet another version of the inclusion syntax (admittedly, the last one is a few months old). We decided to very much simplify the syntax and also the ability of the inclusion syntax, and depend on anything more complex than what will be possible with that syntax on Lua. I am expecting that a lot of people will not like this idea. Therefore I will start two threads: first this one, where we discuss if the inclusion syntax is actually sufficient or if it lacks absolutely essential features that should not depend on Lua. <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Inclusion_syntax_v0.3> And a second thread where we discuss the details and merits of the proposal as it is, and if there are issues with it as it is. Cheers, Denny P.S.: yes, I learned that we should not have too many topics per thread starter. Let's see if this gets any feedback at all :) -- Project director Wikidata Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.