Hoi
When you look at the statistics, you will find that we aggressively pursue
the inclusion of labels. When there is no label in your language it is
tough. When you use Reasonator there is no problem; you will always see a
label in whatever language is available.
My problem is that we know that the prize was won. The item is likely to
have a label. For the rest ... as they say in double Dutch.. "search it but
out".
Thanks,
GerardM
On 31 May 2015 at 18:40, Andre Engels <andreengels(a)gmail.com> wrote:
And what if Q99999 does not have a label? How am I
going from the
information "Q99999 won the Nobel Prize in Literature" to "Q99999
is/is not Patrick Modiano"?
André
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
Not enough data. Q99999 may have a label that is "Patrick Modiano".. your
first challenge is to find out that your Patrick Modiano is indeed that
particular one. Given that you know what award was won, you have a start.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 31 May 2015 at 17:40, Andre Engels <andreengels(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> And that helps me how? Most awards have been won by more than one
> person. If I know that Q99999 has won the Nobel Prize in literature,
> and I know a fact about Patrick Modiano, should I add that fact to
> Q99999 or should I create a new item?
>
> André
>
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hoi,
> > Typically such items were created because the article about the award
> > mentions them. So it is all a matter of perspective. When the award is
> > leading, the information about an award winner is in the article on
the
> > award. Having all these awardees on the
article is not so great, it is
> > not
> > what we do.
> >
> > Impossible? Certainly not. Reat the damn article (on the award).
> > Thanks,
> > GerardM
> >
> > On 31 May 2015 at 17:06, Daniel Kinzler <daniel.kinzler(a)wikimedia.de>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 31.05.2015 um 15:21 schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
> >> > Hoi,
> >> > When someone or something received an award, it is needed if only
to
> >> > complete
> >> > the list of recipients of that award.. There is no benchmark for
> >> > enough
> >> > information. The notion that you a Nobel award winner is not
relevant
> >> > is
> >> > poppycock. With automated descriptions awards do show.
> >>
> >> If you have an item that says someone whon a nobel prize, but not
when
> >> or
> >> which,
> >> and also does *noit* have a label, that items is quite useless; it'S
> >> impossible
> >> to tell which person it is even referring to.
> >>
> >> That is what markus is talking about. For people, if there is a
label,
> we
> already have pretty good info. But if there is no label, we have a
> problem, and
> if there isn't any other identifying info,m the item is useless.
>
>
> --
> Daniel Kinzler
> Senior Software Developer
>
> Wikimedia Deutschland
> Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
--
André Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
--
André Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata