Dead tree references will be oh so totally allowed :)
About archiving the digital ones: let's see. The Wikipedias in general do
not solve this problem either, so it seems reasonable to assume that this
is not a high requirement. Or, put other way: reliable sources seem to have
rather stable URIs.
Archiving might still be interesting, but you mentioned a bunch of problems
with this already.
Cheers,
Denny
2012/4/2 Scott Beardsley <sc0ttbeardsley(a)gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 2:27 PM, emijrp
<emijrp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dead trees references are allowed today at
Wikipedia. Why not at
Wikidata?
Thanks, I wasn't sure of the policy for wikipedia. I hope this
continues on into wikidata.
I mean archiving all the digital references.
Jeblad's suggestion to store (and potentially republish) the important
fragment sounds reasonable (IANAL though). I wonder if the folks at
archive.org might have some suggestions since they seem to have blazed
a trail in this space.
Scott
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
--
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Eisenacher Straße 2 | 10777 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 |
http://wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.