Thanks.

If you're on Twitter, I recommend you follow the #altmetrics feed where many of these issues are being actively discussed (including Wikipedia's citations/reuse of the literature). 

NISO's Recommended Practice on Altmetrics Data Quality might also be of interest:
http://www.niso.org/topics/tl/altmetrics_initiative/

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:30 PM, James Salsman <jsalsman@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Dario,

Since the document specifies "Reproduction is authorised provided the
source is acknowledged," I put it here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B73LgocyHQnfam51TnN3dlVqaVE/view

It has only two explicit mentions of Wikipedia, in the discussion of
ImpactStory on pp. 58-9, but this document is the only official
government (European Commission) discussion of altmetrics for formal
academic reputation assessment I have been able to find anywhere. You
will probably find the discussion in the Forward and Introduction more
pertinent than the in-passing mentions of Wikipedia, and I suggest
reaching out to the authors in person for their recommended official
contacts at the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies and
their government supporters could be even more productive. There seems
to be a real opening to give academia and society a great gift implied
by the other three references, if they can accept it. Thank you so
much for your interest!

Best regards,
Jim

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Dario Taraborelli
<dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> James – I'm interested in reading [1] but the PDF is behind a login screen,
> can I read this somewhere else (or do you have the full reference so I can
> search it)?
>
> Thanks,
> Dario
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:43 PM, James Salsman <jsalsman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can anyone familiar with European Commission procedure please explain
>> how to support the Wikipedia-associated proposals in [1] based on the
>> statistics in [2] please? Very recent publications such as [3] in
>> Nature along with what appears to be a relatively sudden groundswell
>> of frankness and support e.g. [4] suggests to me that the time is
>> right to get out in front of these proposals.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Nicholas5/publication/275349828_Emerging_reputation_mechanisms_for_scholars/links/553a22a60cf2c415bb06e6b7.pdf
>>
>> [2] http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~xshuai/papers/jcdl240-shuai.pdf
>>
>> [3] http://www.nature.com/news/fewer-numbers-better-science-1.20858
>>
>> [4]
>> http://blog.scielo.org/en/2016/10/14/is-it-possible-to-normalize-citation-metrics/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dario Taraborelli  Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
> wikimediafoundation.orgnitens.org • @readermeter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Publicpolicy mailing list
> Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
>



--

Dario Taraborelli  Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter