Waterfall the Anamorphic Development.
Ok so how about we recocnize what the overal goal is first . Then establish the point that its trying to convay. Only then can we meet in the middle and set a plan in motion. I can only assist when a plan of action is clear with a definite plan without it im lost on where to begin. It seems as if im doing my natural instinct research then I get mail from the people im reading about... Very interesting this is because im left to think my mind is linked to the problems at hand. TS is my old signature, my server os will pull up my IP searches. Which leads me to believe this is why I am always being brought up in the middle of these outstanding conversations you guys are having lol. Please send detailed instructions as to how I can help,there should be a file known as Mila.eu also known as ro.eula. Find it and run whatever it has, thanks.
-patiently waiting your responce.
-MilaStarX-TSOn Apr 19, 2013 3:29 AM, "Platonides" <platonides@gmail.com> wrote:On 19/04/13 01:19, DaB. wrote:
> as you may know there is a rev_text_id-field in the revision-table. This field
> points to the text-table where the actual text is – or should be. Because the
> WMF doesn’t store the text here, but only a pointer ("DB://cluster25/11458305"
> for example). If you query different wikis you will see that most of them point
> to the same cluster or one with a number short by. That says me (and I was
> also told so before) that all text of all wmf-projects are stored together.
> The task would now to separate wikidata from the rest – but the storage-area
> has no clue from where a text is which makes the separating very hard. And
> there is another problem: Deleted texts are also in this area, so even more
> filtering would be needed.
> I very doubt that this situation will change at the TS and I also doubt that
> it will be different for WikiLabs. So I guess your best bet is the API here.
>
> Sincerely,
> DaB.
I think the only hope would be if wikidata was stored under its own
cluster (for easier differenciation) and at least one server of that
group (the master?) only had that (so toolserver could get its binlogs).
_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette