I'm in. Just give me an idea of the structure that you have in mind and
I'll get to organizing.
-Aaron
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Dario Taraborelli <
dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi Aaron,
nice work, thanks for getting this started – I suggest we use a short and
accessible summary based on your draft as a landing page for all WMF
research policy. We could then point readers to specific pages depending on
the specific requirements of their research. I discussed with Erik some
weeks ago the possibility of restructuring the research section on Meta and
he suggested we could create a dedicated Research namespace on Meta which
would allow better tracking of research policy documentation as well as have
a dedicated search engine, if that makes sense to RCom members I'll go ahead
and start restructuring contents in this direction. Someone recently
complained that we don't have an RCom category and I'm all for making the
documentation we produce more accessible and easy to navigate.
Dario
On Apr 27, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Aaron Halfaker wrote:
Hey folks,
Systems were down today so I managed to get a little bit of writing done.
I've worked up a draft of a guideline for on-wiki research (
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:EpochFail/On-wiki_research).
I'm looking for feedback and/or edits. I'm hoping to use this as a
catalyst to restart discussions around research policy, recruitment and
interfaces with Wikimedia communities. The next thing on my plate is a
rewrite of the Subject Recruitment Approvals Group. I should have more on
that soon.
Thanks,
-Aaron (EpochFail)
_______________________________________________
RCom-l mailing list
RCom-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
_______________________________________________
RCom-l mailing list
RCom-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l