Michael, 

Please accept my apologies on behalf of the Research Committee for the amount of time you have waited for a decision.  Given the lack of concerns raised since the start of the second poll, I advise that you move forward with your pilot and report the response rate you receive on the project page.

-Aaron

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Michael Tsikerdekis <tsikerdekis@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Aaron,

first of all, happy new year and all the best!

I wanted to write sooner but i preferred not to disturb during the holidays. Do you have any news about the voting process? I sent today an email to DarTar so hopefully(fingers crossed) he is going to answer and be supportive of the project.

-Michael


2011/12/11 Aaron Halfaker <aaron.halfaker@gmail.com>
Michael,

Congratulations for getting your work accepted.

I'm not sure that posting about it will help us reach consensus faster, but it couldn't hurt.  I'd be surprised if you wouldn't be able to post public about your work being accepted, but I'm only familiar with Computer Science journals.  At the very least, you should now be able to cite the work with a future publication date. 

-Aaron


On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Michael Tsikerdekis <tsikerdekis@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Aaron,

just wanted to let you know that i keep an eye on the discussion about the topic. Btw i just received yesterday a letter of acceptance for my work that has been under blind peer-review (http://www.eminds.uniovi.es). I still have to make some revisions but will be published in the open journal at the 30th of March. Do you think i should post it in the discussion? I have no idea if i am allowed to disclose such information in public before the publication is released to the public but i could write that it has been accepted and anybody interested can request the specifics from me personally.

Let me know what you think :-)

Mike