On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Nathan &lt;nawrich(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: This might be a good point for the list moderator (someone from Legal?) Generally, I think list moderation is *extremely* important for keeping a mailing list healthy. I described my best practices for behavior and moderation in the draft OSI Code of Conduct for Mailing Lists: http://opensource.org/codeofconduct/licensing However, I don't think that imposing such a policy in the middle of a hot debate is a good idea. So I suggest we have a discussion about that once this has run its natural course. In this specific case, I agree that the tone has become hostile and unconstructive from some participants. I hope everyone will take a deep breath, and if appropriate, apologize either to specific people who have been attacked or to the list as a whole for creating an unproductive environment. I also hope that, in keeping with the "disclose potential conflicts" section of the OSI code linked above, some of the new list members will introduce themselves and explain their interests and motives for joining the group. Advocates from other groups are of course welcome here, but we hope in the spirit of transparency you'll disclose your goals and intentions for joining in our community. Thanks- Luis -- Luis Villa Deputy General Counsel Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6810 *This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer>.* _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors