On Fri, August 7, 2009 17:03, Michael Dale wrote:
Thanks for you interest in metavid, I really like what
you have done
with the
openmeetings.org site.
Thanks! Please send critical feedback as I am striving for rapid growth.
I would just mention that you really should use a bit
smaller
granularity in your transcripts. Big text blocks make it difficult to
search the transcripts and quickly jump to what your looking for.
I have been using logical breakpoints to delineate transcripts ("paragraph
chunks") as opposed to sentence-level chunks on the basis that it makes
reading-while-watching easier. This does make search more difficult, so
if there is a way to use a hybrid approach (e.g., short transcripts
grouped into paragraphs when displayed), I'd be all for that.
A temporary hack might be to have Special:MediaSearch check keyword
placement relative to the start of the transcript and make the jump
accordingly.
comments inline: I have cc'ed the metavid-l list.
Hi list!
I will try and post this "roadmap" on the
wiki sometime soon cuz I
realize I have been so busy programing I have not keep people updated
with ~the plan~.
George Chriss wrote:
Hi sj,
During the OVC conference you mentioned that you might know devs
interested in hacking on MetaVidWiki, which isn't being actively
developed
at the moment pending [[MW:Media Projects Overview|the big push]]. I've
been able to hammer
OpenMeetings.org into a workable condition, but now
I'm split on finishing a video backlog vs. blogging and site maintenance
vs. finding and training volunteers to annotate videos as they're
uploaded. To add to this, I'm under increasing demand as a
cameraperson.
(Yikes!)
We can do a post on
metavid.org about the site (we don't get too many
visitors and not too may transcript contributers either ;) but maybe a
post on wikitech blog too.
We're slated for a posting on the OVA blog (Ben Moskowitz CC'd), and I
have one or two other blogs in mind too.
There is a lot of work taking place on metavid pieces like the
javascript player and the javascript sequencer. This is not necessarily
reflected in the extension code as the javascript components have been
moved to the trunk. The idea it to as best as possible make every pieces
as reusable in a stand alone context as possible, this means a stand
alone sequencer / video editor that exports flat files a stand alone
skinnable player that can embed ogg video anywhere with a simple script
include, a stand alone firefogg encoder to export videos etc.
Sounds good. I'm excited about what would be possible with the sequencer
as Theora editing is an uphill process. Also, Monty mentioned "editing
Ogg" (with one packet(?) per frame, vs. "standard"/"export" Ogg)
might be
implemented to make Ogg super-seekable in editing software.
My next major task is to split the extension up into
up into separate
"stand alone" extensions "Sequencer", "Timed Text", and
"Temporal Media
Search". ( Will create a "metavidCore" that will hold the shared
functions and then re-factor all the existing metavid code into new
cleaner versions as stand alone sub extensions. This way a simple check
out of metavidWiki running trunk gives you all that functionality.
Other "sub-extensions" will be:
OggHanlder (handles user uploaded ogg video uploads)
WikiAtHome extension (helps distribute transcode and flattening
operations, we also want to integrate a bittrorent client with video tag
support)
"Semantic Media Wiki" (handles semantic properties on videos explained
in more detail below)
There are several areas where development work would be helpful:
==User-selectable mirrors==
I prefer to keep the video streams at reasonably-high quality, using Ogg
Theora. The trade-off is of course bandwidth; I'm not really sure how
quickly video loads on non-mid-Atlantic connections. Ideally,
JavaScript
would be able to guess the closest video mirror (e.g., the Internet
Archive for visitors from CA). For bandwidth-restricted visitors, an
audio-only option would be helpful.
That is a good idea to use the localization feature of Firefox to choose
a near by mirror. But its better to handle this at the CDN level ...
Yes, of course---I hadn't thought this far ahead.
Are there any suggestions for CDNs that have oggz-chop CGI and reasonably
good privacy standards? (I'm aiming for library-grade privacy standards.)
DIY maybe, with WMF and others? Cortado applet signing would also be
helpful here.
I
think ultimately our thin development effort here
would be best spent on
integrating a media streaming bitttorent client into firefogg. We could
add "read only" bittroent for java cortado users, include http seeding
support (which works with byte offsets request so traditional servers
can be easy to add to the seeding pool). That way you client always
tries to download from the fastest peer be it normal http server near by
or someone with a fat pipe in Alaska.
I do use web-seeded, trackerless, Archive-hosted torrents to ensure
long-term media availability; however, I think the CDN approach would be
more sensible on a couple of counts:
-Network efficiency (i.e., avoiding traffic over last-mile lines)
-Avoiding a start-up delay before the video reaches a "ready to play" state
-Long tail traffic makes BitTorrent critical mass harder to achieve
There's a stigma associated with BitTorrent in corporate environments, so
I suggest making BitTorrent disabled-by-default or to offer two versions
of Firefogg. I like the idea, though.
Also, I've
noticed a "local seek" feature but haven't had time to look
at
it in detail.
This basically does a local seek instead of an oggz_chop server request
when the media has been loaded up to that point.
Ah, I see. Is there a way to load media from the local filesystem?
==Identi.ca==
A good way to increase project visibility would be to integrate
Identi.ca
dents (also CC-BY). A basic start would be to load dents in a new
time-aligned text layer according to a common hashtag, such that
visitors
could see who dented what during a meeting. I have a PHP script that
saves dents for this purpose.
A more-advanced approach would be to also enable visitors to select who
to
'subscribe' to while watching a meeting, such that you could follow what
your friends dented during a meeting.
Finally, a really fancy approach would be to build an API such that a
visitor could dent _from_
OpenMeetings.org while watching a meeting, for
later review by others. The dent could be labeled "..from
OpenMeetings.org", which would then link to the specific point in the
meeting from which the dent originated.
There is some excitement on this topic at Penn State:
http://www.colecamplese.com/2009/07/twitter-annotations/
That sounds really cool. The idea to integrate jabber transcrits was
also discussed at one point. Aphid may be able to tell you more about
that ;) ... I think what we need is a solid API to enable easily
building of those types of tools. Unfortunately I built metavid version
1 a while a go and did not structure it as I would have today.
Subsequent versions should make it very easy to add layers of transcript
data in simple interfaces. Also things like re-capatchca style
transcription & translation are key for quick and easy participation.
/me readies a pitch to reCAPTCHA to see if this would be possible, as
audio challenges from "open meetings" might match the ORC work in terms of
being a good cause. Need to find a way not to break things...
==Geo-searching==
I've started to include GPS coordinates with video uploads, such that
visitors could search for meetings by both location and time.
Search-by-location is not yet implemented.
I believe there is some geo-location property work done in semantic
wiki. If we can integrate with that effort that would be ideal. Pad.ma
site also did some neat things with video tagging in that regard.
Yes, I have a few sessions on semantic geo-location from Wiki-Conference
2009, to be published as soon as I am able.
==Semantic cleanup==
I don't really know what I'm doing with semantic metadata (e.g.,
labeling
speakers). Help?
if you just label speakers its useful ... You can see how its useful
maybe you have some video talking /about John Doe/ and some videos /of
John Doe talking/. And you want to avoid categorization verbosity with
chance of inconsistency of categorization. Ie one person says "spoken by
john doe" another tags it with just "john doe" its hard to know what is
what.
Other things you could semantically tag are things like geo-location (We
already put the temporal tag in the wiki temporal annotation title) Only
special properties that have semantic meaning like geo-location are
ideal for semantic tagging withing the context of timed media attributes.
Everything else should fall a category or "tag" not be a semantic
property.
The real value is combining semantic properties about speakers and or
you your case potential geo-location, so show me meeting where John Doe
is in Texas speaking about "Free Speech" (where Free Speech is just a
category, and John Doe is in Texas are semantic properties.
Clip labels weren't sticking for some reason, but I'll take another crack.
Should be a simple fix.
==OLPC XO==
I'm curious to know if playback works on XOs, and if not what it would
take to make this happen.
probably need to innovate on the interface a little make it work with
smaller screen, we already support a hardware accelerated rendering via
plugins (something the XO needs as it can't decode Firefox video in
software very easily) and would be nice to integrate into other features
of the device like accepting uploads captured on the device.
Yes, I also have an impromptu video-on-XO session from OVC, also to be
published as soon as I am able.
hope this was helpfull, keep us updated on your efforts,
Very much so.
Cheers,
George
peace,
--michael
_______________________________________________
MetaVid-l mailing list
MetaVid-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/metavid-l